Michael Pettis
{
"authors": [
"Michael Pettis"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"Carnegie China Commentaries"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [
"China’s Reform Imperative"
],
"regions": [
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}Source: Getty
Why Should China Borrow Abroad?
In spite of China’s extraordinarily high investment levels, domestic savings nonetheless exceed domestic investment by quite a lot, making it a large net exporter of capital.
This publication is a product of Carnegie China. For more work by Carnegie China, click here.
An article in Xinhua on July 23 says that the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) will actively support high-quality enterprises of various ownership structures in borrowing foreign debt. According to the article:
China is set to support prominent, creditworthy companies that promote high-quality development within the real economy by allowing them to borrow medium to long-term foreign debt. The NDRC announced this initiative Tuesday as part of the country’s strategy to further open up and enhance cross-border financing facilitation.
This strikes me as a little curious. In spite of China’s extraordinarily high investment levels, domestic savings nonetheless exceed domestic investment by quite a lot, making it a large net exporter of capital. We can see this in the huge trade surpluses the country has been running. It is worth noting that China’s current account surpluses are much lower, but there are real questions about the extent to which net outflows that belong in its capital account have shown up in the current account. Council on Foreign Relations’s Brad Setser has written extensively about this, including here and here.
Either way, this implies that China doesn’t suffer from a domestic capital shortage. Add in the fact that Chinese interest rates are much lower than U.S. (and other) interest rates, and that the US dollar (USD) has been volatile relative to the renminbi (RMB), and it’s hard to see why the regulators would want to encourage Chinese companies to borrow abroad—almost all of which is likely to be in foreign currencies.
One reason may be because the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) wants to expand its domestic money supply without putting downward currency pressure on the RMB. If Chinese companies borrow USD to convert into RMB, they create demand for RMB. As they sell the USD that they acquired through borrowing to the PBoC, whose reserves subsequently rise, the PBoC creates additional RMB as it purchases the USD. I believe this has the effect of expanding to domestic money supply without putting downward pressure on the exchange value of the RMB, something the PBoC has tried to avoid—probably because it worsens trade relationships and because it tends to increase capital flight. If that is the case, it might explain why a country that exports capital wants nonetheless to encourage its large companies to borrow abroad.
For those who worry about the risk of an external debt problem, there isn’t much cause for concern. By the end of 2023, China’s total outstanding foreign debt stood at $2.45 trillion, with medium- to long-term debt accounting for 44 percent, according to the State Administration of Foreign Exchange. Against that, the PBoC has over $3.2 trillion in reported reserves, and there are another roughly $2 trillion held by other state-controlled financial entities. China has more than enough foreign currency to manage external debt risks quite easily.
About the Author
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets.
- The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for ChinaCommentary
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
Michael Pettis
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Does the EU Have a France Problem?Commentary
With its public finances in shambles, the far right polling at 35 percent ahead of the 2027 presidential election, and a growing protest movement, is France’s crisis a threat to the EU’s geopolitical awakening?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The EU’s Middle-Power PuzzleCommentary
While the EU and European governments are embracing the much-lauded middle-power moment, this entails three difficult conundrums.
Richard Youngs
- The Scramble for Europe. Russia, China, and Turkey Challenging Regional OrderBook
Europe is facing rising populism internally as well as external pressures from Russia, China, Turkey, and the United States.
Dimitar Bechev
- Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Stare Down China on Trade?Commentary
The European Commissioner for Trade is headed to China. But after President Xi’s bridge-building visit to Washington, can a more isolated EU overcome Beijing’s stranglehold on critical raw materials? Who will blink first?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- How Le Pen Benefits from the Stalemate in UkraineCommentary
The domestic impacts of how long it is taking to end the war in Ukraine have pushed the French electorate to the political extremes and compromised the country’s diplomatic capacity.
Rym Momtaz