• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Amr Hamzawy"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Israel",
    "United States",
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "topics": []
}
Overhead shot of a man kneeling next to flowers and candles

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul visits a memorial at the Capital Jewish Museum following a May 21 shooting that left two Israeli Embassy staff dead. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

Commentary

Rejecting the Implicit Justification of Hate Crimes and Antisemitism

The moral and political yardstick that denounces the violence in Palestine must also condemn crimes against Jewish citizens.

Link Copied
By Amr Hamzawy
Published on Jun 26, 2025

In recent years, violence, hate crimes, and antisemitism targeting Jewish citizens in the United States, Europe, and other parts of the world have been escalating. Just a few weeks ago in Washington, DC, two Israeli Embassy staffers were killed by a man who reportedly shouted “free Palestine.” Days later, a man in Boulder, Colorado, told police that he had attacked a group calling for the release of hostages in Gaza because he wanted to “kill all Zionist people.”

Some of these incidents received few—if any—headlines. But the right to life is indivisible, and the moral and political yardstick that rightly denounces the bloodshed in Palestine must also condemn individual crimes against Jewish and Israeli citizens. It is a profound mistake for people of conscience—those who reject war, mass killings, the occupation and settlement of others’ land, and forced displacement in the Middle East—to remain silent.

Some have justified their silence by citing the scale of the war in Gaza, the structural violence committed by the Israeli occupation and settler groups in the West Bank, or the bloody and destructive toll these crimes inflict on the Palestinian people. They have used quantitative comparisons that note the number of victims in Palestine far exceeds those of antisemitic crimes against Jews and Israelis, as well as qualitative ones that point to the vast differences between a raging war and recurring yet individual acts of violence. But this amounts either to a morally and politically unacceptable conflation or a retreat from a universal human principle: the rejection of killing and violence, regardless of whether it is perpetrated by a government, a group, or individuals, and regardless of whether the victims are an entire people, a community, or a single person.

Legitimate and essential solidarity with the Palestinian people—who face war, starvation, the dangers of settlement expansion, displacement, occupation, and the obliteration of their just cause—must never entail the denial of the right of Jewish citizens around the world to live in safety and to be protected from hate crimes and antisemitism.

Just as it is necessary to refrain from attributing Hamas’s actions to the entire Palestinian people, it is also essential to make a clear distinction between Israeli civilians uninvolved in the war against the Palestinian people and the political, military, and security officials responsible for it.

Likewise, defending the right of Jewish citizens, Israeli civilians, and those not complicit in decisions of war to live safely must not be made conditional on their solidarity with the Palestinian people’s right to exist, self-determination, and an end to war, settlements, and occupation.

In other words, Jewish citizens and Israeli civilians who deny Palestinians’ right to a state and support actions such as the Gaza war, further settlements in the West Bank, or the reoccupation of Gaza still have the same right to safety and protection from antisemitism and hate crimes. Everyone has a duty to defend them, just as we all have a duty to defend those who support Palestinian rights and oppose the policies of the far-right government led by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Our agreement or disagreement with others on principles of justice and rights must never determine whether we recognize their right to life and safety. That right is nonnegotiable, and our defense of it must not be limited to those who share our views.

The Israeli politicians, military, and security leaders who design and promote policies of war, settlement, and occupation are the true decisionmakers, and they must be held legally accountable in accordance with Israeli law and international legal principles, possibly including proceedings in the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.

Their warmongering and violence do not justify promoting the inverse of their actions. That was the catastrophic error committed by Hamas when it carried out its brutal attack on October 7, 2023. The proper course is to demand that those responsible for terrorism and violence face justice—justice administered through national and international courts. Humanity must insist that those responsible for the October 7 attacks, as well as those responsible for the crimes committed in the Gaza war, face justice, even if global political realities and power dynamics make this goal difficult to achieve.

About the Author

Amr Hamzawy

Director, Middle East Program

Amr Hamzawy is a senior fellow and the director of the Carnegie Middle East Program. His research and writings focus on governance in the Middle East and North Africa, social vulnerability, and the different roles of governments and civil societies in the region.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Iran Is Pushing Its Neighbors Toward the United States

      Amr Hamzawy

  • Paper
    U.S. Peace Mediation in the Middle East: Lessons for the Gaza Peace Plan
      • Sarah Yerkes

      Amr Hamzawy, Sarah Yerkes, Kathryn Selfe

Amr Hamzawy
Director, Middle East Program
Amr Hamzawy
IsraelUnited StatesMiddle East

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good Reasons

    The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.

      Marc Pierini

  • Article
    Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of Connectivity

    The U.S.-sponsored TRIPP deal is driving the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process forward. But foreign and domestic hurdles remain before connectivity and economic interdependence can open up the South Caucasus.

      • Areg Kochinyan

      Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?

    Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic Opportunity

    The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.

      William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Is the Radical-Right Threat Existential or Overstated?

    Amid increased polarization and the influence of disinformation, radical-right parties are once again gaining traction across Europe. With landmark elections on the horizon in several countries, are the EU’s geostrategic vision and fundamental values under existential threat?

      Catherine Fieschi, Cas Mudde

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.