According to a poll conducted jointly by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation and the Razumkov Center and publicized in early January, only 3 percent of Ukrainians think that the overall situation in Ukraine has improved. Moreover, these improvements are mostly associated with the country’s national defense capabilities.

The results of the poll were more readily available, at least in summary form, in Ukrainian than in English. Continuing a long-lasting trend, this poll confirms that not a single Ukrainian politician or political institution can count on citizens’ trust. The most trusted institutions are the army and patrol units, including voluntary formations. Interestingly, trust in local councils is higher than in national institutions.

According to this poll, for 44 percent of the respondents, visa-free travel to the EU was important, while 50 percent said it was not. This divide is probably best interpreted not as opposition to visa-free travel in general but as a reflection of who can realistically make use of this right, which is expected to be introduced in 2017. Some Ukrainian experts have interpreted this poll as a sign of growing Euroskepticism in Ukraine in response to slow progress on visa liberalization and the April 2016 Dutch referendum result that rejected the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement.

The latest survey is in line with regular Razumkov Center polls that show that already in early 2016, over 70 percent of Ukrainians thought that the country was heading in the wrong direction. Even at the height of the 2013–2014 Euromaidan antigovernment protests, about 55 percent considered their country to be on the wrong track. Only immediately after the 2004 Orange Revolution and around Viktor Yanukovych’s election as president in 2010 did the share of those considering Ukraine’s path to be the wrong one drop to or below 30 percent.

The latest five-year poll of the Kiev International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) established that the perceived well-being of society at large continues to be much lower than perceived individual well-being. The latter recorded a slight increase in the second half of 2016 but is still at such a low level (and below the level of 2012) that it does not alter the overall assessment. Thus, the latest survey results should not come as a surprise. But they capture the proportions of a worrying downward trend in Ukrainians’ perceptions of their personal and their country’s political and economic prospects.

In view of the possibility that Ukraine could face an early parliamentary election in 2017–2018, the KIIS poll of December 2016 about electoral preferences carries weight. Of those surveyed, 8.6 percent said they would vote for former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko’s Fatherland party, followed by the Opposition Bloc (5.7 percent) and the president’s Petro Poroshenko Bloc (5.6 percent). The calculation is that given the high share of undecided (24 percent) and abstaining respondents (21.9 percent), the actual party shares would look as follows: Fatherland would obtain about 18 percent of the vote, the Opposition Bloc and the Petro Poroshenko Bloc about 12 percent each.

Similarly, Tymoshenko would score the highest number of votes in a presidential election (about 18 percent), followed by Petro Poroshenko (12.5 percent) and former vice prime minister Yuriy Boyko (about 12 percent).

Too few people outside Ukraine take note of the mood in the country. Moreover, even if one wants to go beyond the common focus on the elites and find out about Ukrainians’ views, this is not a straightforward matter. Opinion poll data are often not publicly available—or at least, not immediately. The list of readily available results on the websites of institutions like the Razumkov Center or the Democratic Initiatives Foundation does not include much fresh data from 2016. KIIS offers more regular updates on a range of surveys in Ukrainian and Russian, and some in English.

Dependence on external money for commissioned research seems to crowd out publicly available data at a time when this should be vital information for anybody inside or outside Ukraine interested in helping the country’s reform process. Western scholars frequently commission detailed surveys and some produce significant studies in due course, but the delay inherent in this type of research cannot fill the gap of reliable, regular short-term information on what Ukrainians actually think.

 

Gwendolyn Sasse is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe and the director of the Center for East European and International Studies (ZOiS) in Berlin.