• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Marina Barnett"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}

Source: Getty

Other

Latest Protests in Bishkek: Another Political Diversion?

The October 3 protests in Bishkek appear to be orchestrated to exploit the volatile situation around the Kumtor gold mine to advance certain political agendas and to divert attention from legal troubles facing some Kyrgyz politicians.

Link Copied
By Ms. Marina Barnett
Published on Oct 4, 2012

On October 3, at least 2,000 Kyrgyz opposition protesters clashed with police in Bishkek’s central square and made two attempts to storm the parliament. The protests, apparently instigated by two members of the Ata Jurt faction in the Kyrgyz parliament, Kamchibek Tashiyev and Sadyr Japarov, demanded the nationalization of the Kumtor gold mining venture.

Kumtor, the largest gold mine in Kyrgyzstan and one of the largest gold deposits in the world, is owned by Toronto-based Centerra Gold. In 2011, Kumtor accounted for 12 percent of Kyrgzystan’s GDP and more than 50 percent of its exports. While Centerra owns Kumtor and its output, Kyrgyzstan retains a 33 percent stake in Centerra, according to an agreement signed in 2009.

In June 2012, a 300-page report by a Kyrgyz parliamentary commission accused Centerra of stealing gold and damaging local environment. Centerra called the accusations “unfounded” and “without merit.” Nevertheless, the Kyrgyz parliament voted to nationalize the company, but fell short. It settled on directing the government to revise the 2009 agreement and to revoke government decrees and licenses in relation to the project.

According to analysts, if Kumtor is nationalized, the mine’s international investors will undoubtedly file claims for lost revenue. Kyrgyzstan will have to respond to those international arbitration claims, which might cost millions of dollars. It would also damage the country’s reputation in the world and make it much harder to obtain international assistance or attract foreign investment. Earlier this month, Kyrgyz prime minister Zhantoro Satybaldiyev ruled out nationalization of the mine.

The volatile situation around Kumtor is likely being exploited by certain political forces in Kyrgyzstan to advance their own political agendas. Some Kyrgyz experts suggested that the October 3 protests were a well-planned provocation aimed at destabilizing the country, and that Tashiyev, Japarov, and their followers instigated these events in an attempt to demonstrate their political power.

Others argued that the protests had been organized to divert attention from the criminal charges filed against Japarov. In September 2012 the general procurator’s office accused Japarov of participating in fraudulent activities and selling illegally obtained property. As a member of parliament, Japarov has immunity from criminal prosecution, however the general procurator’s office can petition the parliament to have the immunity stripped.

The protests are expected to continue.
 

Ms. Marina Barnett
Former Program Manager, Russia and Eurasia Program

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Kushner and Putin shaking hands, with Witkoff standing next to them
    Commentary
    Emissary
    What If Trump Gets His Russia-Ukraine Deal?

    It’s dangerous to dismiss Washington’s shambolic diplomacy out of hand.

      Eric Ciaramella

  • Abstract of global AI
    Article
    South-South AI Collaboration: Advancing Practical Pathways

    The India AI Impact Summit offers a timely opportunity to experiment with and formalize new models of cooperation.

      Lakshmee Sharma, Jane Munga

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?

    EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Article
    What Can the EU Do About Trump 2.0?

    Europe’s policy of subservience to the Trump administration has failed. For Washington to take the EU seriously, its leaders now need to combine engagement with robust pushback.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    To Survive, the EU Must Split

    Leaning into a multispeed Europe that includes the UK is the way Europeans don’t get relegated to suffering what they must, while the mighty United States and China do what they want.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.