Kazakhstan's Semipalatinsk: From Nuclear Testing Site to Test Ban Treaty Support
IN THIS ISSUE: Semipalatinsk and the CTBT, IAEA safety proposals weakened, Tehran says no to nuclear swap, NRC expanding team to check for quake damage, Iran sues Russia over defense systems, India could have anti-missile shield by 2014.
Semipalatinsk: From Nuclear Testing Site to Test Ban Treaty Support Togzhan Kassenova | Carnegie Commentary
August 29 is a red letter day for nuclear testing. On that day in 1949, the Soviet military began forty years of nuclear tests—456 in all—at Semipalatinsk nuclear test site in the steppes of Kazakhstan. On August 29, 1991, following protests by thousands of Soviet citizens united by the Nevada-Semipalatinsk Movement, Kazakhstan shut down the site.
|
 | |
|
Fredrik Dahl | Reuters
Countries with atomic power plants would be encouraged to host international safety review missions, under a draft U.N. action plan that may disappoint those who had hoped for strong measures to prevent a repeat of Japan's nuclear crisis. Full Article
Ramin Mostaghim | Babylon and Beyond/LA Times
Iran says it's no longer interested in talking with the West about swapping nuclear fuel rather than making its own. Iran says it wants to make fuel to supply a reactor for medical purposes. Full Article
Matthew L. Wald | New York Times
The earthquake last Tuesday in Virginia may have produced stronger shaking at the North Anna nuclear plant than the reactors were designed to withstand. Full Article
UPI
Iran sued Russia in the International Court of Justice over its refusal to supply S-300 missile systems, an Iranian diplomat said. The two countries signed a contract in 2007 requiring Russia to provide Iran with at least five S-300 systems. Full Article
Ajai Shukla | Business Standard
In an exclusive interview, the Defence R&D Organisation's chief missile scientist has announced that, within three years, India will have a fully deployed missile-defence shield to safeguard a city like New Delhi from missile-borne nuclear attack. Full Article
|
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.