Proliferation News September 29, 2026
IN THIS ISSUE: Australia’s Reckoning: The Trade-offs of US Extended Nuclear Deterrence, Trump and Xi agreed on “strategic stability.” They now need to decide what it means, Trump denies offering Iran sanctions relief for nuclear concessions, How to Fix the US-Saudi Nuclear 123 Agreement, The THAAD Delusion, Turkey: Ankara’s Nuclear Ambitions in the Post-Iran War Environment.
Australia’s Reckoning: The Trade-offs of US Extended Nuclear Deterrence
Celia McDowall | Survival
Growing strategic threats and doubts about the reliability of US security guarantees are prompting many US allies to reconsider their reliance on US extended nuclear deterrence. Australia, however, is not among them. Canberra is instead doubling down on its alliance with the United States, deepening military integration and increasing its contribution to US nuclear operations. In doing so, it seeks to secure American commitment to Australian and regional security. This approach reflects a long-standing bargain: Australia accepts various risks associated with supporting US nuclear deterrence, including exposure to direct nuclear threat, in exchange for the security benefits of a credible American guarantee.
Trump and Xi agreed on “strategic stability.” They now need to decide what it means
Tong Zhao | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
When Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping meet in Washington this week, one phrase demands particular attention: the “constructive relationship of strategic stability” they agreed to pursue in May. Beijing hailed the language as a historic diplomatic achievement, one that could redefine the world’s most consequential bilateral relationship of this new century. But the two leaders never agreed on what “strategic stability” means or will require.
Trump denies offering Iran sanctions relief for nuclear concessions
Kanishka Singh | Reuters
US President Donald Trump on Monday denied offering Iran sanctions relief and the release of frozen funds in return for nuclear concessions from Tehran. "This is untrue. I offered them NOTHING," Trump wrote on Truth Social, responding to an Axios report that cited US officials as saying that he was willing to give Iran sanctions relief and release Iranian frozen funds in return for "concrete" Iranian steps regarding the nuclear program. The Axios report did not identify the US officials. CNN also reported, citing an unidentified US official, that Trump was willing to give Iran sanctions relief and release frozen funds as part of a final deal on the condition that Iran offered "concrete progress" on the nuclear issue.
How to Fix the US-Saudi Nuclear 123 Agreement
Ariel E. Levite and Matthew Sharp | The National Interest
Congress can fix most of the problems with the nuclear agreement without simply rejecting it. Last month, the Trump administration submitted a proposed nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia to Congress. It will enter into force by the end of the year unless Congress acts to prevent it. The agreement has obvious shortcomings from a nonproliferation perspective, and its touted benefits seem highly uncertain, leading some to advocate that Congress should prevent its entry into force via a joint resolution of disapproval. But any attempt to pass such a joint measure is unlikely to succeed. Fortunately, over the longer term, Congress has other means to shape the agreement’s implementation better to align it with US interests, nonproliferation and otherwise.
Christopher Leonard | The Atlantic
In the war with Iran, the THAAD has worked precisely as designed—but not at all as promised. The system performed well in the early days of the conflict, intercepting Iranian ballistic missiles with impressive accuracy. But the U.S. has not destroyed many of Iran’s missile launchers, and the war is far from over. And despite planning for just such a conflict for two decades, the U.S. failed to take the steps necessary to convert the THAAD into a system that could provide protection for as long as it would be relied upon to do so.
Turkey: Ankara’s Nuclear Ambitions in the Post-Iran War Environment
Gönül Tol | Middle East Institute
In February 2026, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan suggested that shifting international dynamics could push Turkey to acquire nuclear weapons, reigniting a decades-old debate over Ankara’s nuclear ambitions. Foreign Minister Fidan’s remarks are only the latest in a series of public statements in which President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and other Turkish officials have increasingly challenged nonproliferation norms and even hinted at an interest in acquiring nuclear weapons. That rhetoric, combined with Turkey’s civilian nuclear energy and research programs and its indigenous surface-to-surface missile development projects, has fueled concerns that these capabilities could eventually form the backbone of a Turkish nuclear weapons program.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.