• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
Edition

Saudi Arabia May Acquire Nuclear Capable Dong Feng Ballistic Missiles From China

IN THIS ISSUE: Saudi Arabia may acquire Dong Feng ballistic missiles from China, NATO-Russia relations and missile defense, Iran says sanctions won't change nuclear program, S. Korea, India bolster nuke ties, Pentagon more than doubles cost estimate for B61, plan for Trident if UK breaks up.

Link Copied
Published on July 26, 2012

Proliferation News

Proliferation News is a biweekly newsletter highlighting the latest analysis and trends in the nuclear policy community.

Learn More
 
In This Issue
Saudi Arabia May Acquire Nuclear Capable Dong Feng Ballistic Missiles From China
Saudi Defence
NATO−Russia Relations and Missile Defense: "Sticking Point" or "Game Changer?"
Carnegie Moscow Center Working Paper
Iran Says Sanctions Won't Change Nuclear Program
Hill
South Korea, India Bolster Nuke Ties
Diplomat
Pentagon More Than Doubles Cost Estimate for B61 Nuclear Bomb
Defense News
Alarm About Lack of a Plan for Trident if UK Breaks Up
Herald Scotland

Saudi Arabia May Acquire Nuclear Capable Dong Feng Ballistic Missiles From China

Saudi Defence

Soltanieh

Seen as a response to Iran's march towards the production of nuclear weapons, one of its major rivals in the region, the Saudi Arabia is reported to be in talks with the Chinese authorities, for the purchase of nuclear capable missiles.

Western analysts argue that the Saudi authorities decided to pursue their nuclear ambitions after finding out that the new sanctions and embargoes on Iran are not having their desired effect.

The Saudis are reported to be negotiating for the purchase of DF-21, a Medium Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM). It was developed by the China Changfeng Mechanics and Electronics Technology Academy (CCMETA) during the 1970s.   Full Article



Follow the Nuclear Policy Program
RSS News Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Footer information begins here
More from Proliferation News


NATO−Russia Relations and Missile Defense: "Sticking Point" or "Game Changer?"
Ioanna-Nikoletta Zyga | Carnegie Moscow Center Working Paper
More than a year and a half after the Lisbon summit, the NATO-Russia negotiations for cooperation on missile defense have yet to produce a serious breakthrough. The best way to move forward would be to implement confidence-building measures (CBM) that will allow for greater transparency regarding the system's capabilities and contribute to strengthening mutual relations.     Full Article

Iran Says Sanctions Won't Change Nuclear Program
Jeremy Herb | Hill
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday that economic sanctions against Iran will not stop the country's nuclear program. Speaking on state TV, Khamenei said that the sanctions from the United States and European Union will only give Iran greater confidence to pursue its nuclear ambitions.     Full Article

South Korea, India Bolster Nuke Ties
J. Berkshire Miller | Diplomat
China has reason to worry about a growing Korea-India partnership, but continues to make the shrewd calculation that this is a pact built upon economics and – at least currently – lacks strategic depth. While the US will support increased Indo-Korean ties, not even Washington can change the geographic realities of the Sino-ROK-Indo triangle.     Full Article

Pentagon More Than Doubles Cost Estimate for B61 Nuclear Bomb
Defense News
According to a new estimate from the Pentagon, the life-extension program for the B61 nuclear bomb will now cost roughly $10 billion, two-and-a-half times the original cost proposed. Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., who chairs the Senate Appropriations energy and water development subcommittee, said she was briefed on the bomb’s new estimate July 23.     Full Article

Alarm About Lack of a Plan for Trident if UK Breaks Up
Michael Settle | Herald Scotland
The lack of a contingency plan for Britain's Trident nuclear arsenal if Scotland votes for independence is causing alarm within the UK Government, with one senior source decrying the gap in forward planning as nonsensical. The Coalition source also told The Herald the cost of relocating the nuclear deterrent to England would cost as much as the plan to replace it with a new generation of submarines, some £25 billion.     Full Article

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.