• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
Edition

The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the U.S.

IN THIS ISSUE: The CTBT, images show N. Korea launch work, Clinton on Iran, India to test long-range missile in two weeks, S. Africa considers nuclear fuel cycle facilities, Japan holds off on decision on idled reactors.

Link Copied
Published on April 3, 2012

Proliferation News

Proliferation News is a biweekly newsletter highlighting the latest analysis and trends in the nuclear policy community.

Learn More
 
In This Issue
The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States
National Research Council
Images Show North Korea Launch Work
Associated Press
Clinton to Iran: Show That Nuclear Arms Not Sought
Associated Press
India to Test Long-Range Missile in Two Weeks
Global Security Newswire
South Africa Considers Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities
Reuters
Japan Holds Off on Decision on Idled Reactors
Japan Times

The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States

National Research Council

Semipalatinsk

The United States is now in a better position than at any time in the past to maintain a safe and effective nuclear weapons stockpile without testing and to monitor clandestine nuclear testing abroad, says a new report from the National Research Council.

The report, requested by the Office of the Vice President and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, reviews and updates a 2002 study that examined the technical concerns raised about the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). The report does not take a position on whether the U.S. should ratify the treaty.

"So long as the nation is fully committed to securing its weapons stockpile and provides sufficient resources for doing so, the U.S. has the technical capabilities to maintain safe, reliable nuclear weapons into the foreseeable future without the need for underground weapons testing," said Ellen D. Williams, chief scientist at BP and chair of the committee that wrote the report. "In addition, U.S. and international technologies to monitor weapons testing by other countries are significantly better now than they were a decade ago."     Full Article



Follow the Nuclear Policy Program
RSS News Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Footer information begins here
More from Proliferation News


Images Show North Korea Launch Work
Foster Klug | Associated Press
New satellite images of a North Korean rocket launch site show a mobile radar trailer and rows of what appear to be empty fuel and oxidizer tanks, evidence of ramped-up preparation for what Washington calls a cover for a long-range missile test.     Full Article

Clinton to Iran: Show That Nuclear Arms Not Sought
Bradley Klapper | Associated Press
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Sunday urged Iran to back up its declaration that Islam bars weapons of mass destruction by agreeing to a plan that would prove it does not intend to develop nuclear arms.     Full Article

India to Test Long-Range Missile in Two Weeks
Global Security Newswire
India intends in two weeks to conduct the initial trial of its experimental Agni 5 ballistic missile, the head of the country's Defense Research and Development Organization said on Saturday.     Full Article

 
 
Related
Abu Dhabi Nuclear Bid Speeds Up (National)
South Africa Considers Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities
Wendell Roelf | Reuters
South Africa is mulling the re-establishment of its uranium enrichment and conversion facilities, which were dismantled during the apartheid era, as it seeks to secure fuel for a new fleet of nuclear power stations.     Full Article

 
 
Related
Nuclear Security: Partner with Industry (Lowy Interpreter)
Japan Holds Off on Decision on Idled Reactors
Kazuaki Nagata | Japan Times
Uncertainty grew Tuesday over the timing of the possible restart of the idled Oi nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture, as Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Yukio Edano backed off from an earlier remark.     Full Article

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.