Tough U.S. Sanctions on Iran Go Into Effect as U.S. Targets State Broadcaster
Tough US sanctions on Iran go into effect, Iran's Supreme Leader rejects direct talks with US, N. Korea likely to conduct nuclear test next week, Urenco sale plan divides secretive nuclear fuel club, nuclear watchdog in hot water, budget cutters eye nuclear reprocessing plant.
Tough U.S. Sanctions on Iran Go Into Effect as U.S. Targets State Broadcaster Samuel Rubenfeld | Wall Street Journal
Tough U.S. sanctions on Iran signed into law last August went into effect Wednesday as the Treasury Department announced new designations targeting the state broadcaster, its director as well as three other entities.
|
 | |
|
|
Nasser Karimi | Daily Star
Iran's supreme leader Thursday strongly rejected proposals for direct talks with the United States, effectively quashing suggestions for a breakthrough one-on-one dialogue on the nuclear standoff and potentially other issues. Full Article
Kim Tae-gyu | Korea Times
The majority of analysts in South Korea predict North Korea will carry out its threatened nuclear test next week despite opposition from the international community. Full Article
Geert De Clercq and Fredrik Dahl | Reuters
The planned sale of Urenco poses a quandary for the three European governments that own it. They want a good price for the world's second-largest nuclear fuel vendor, yet are suspicious of every buyer's motives. Full Article
Asahi Shimbun
A senior official of the Nuclear Regulation Authority secretariat was removed for leaking a draft report by an expert panel on seismic activity at the site of the Tsuruga nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture to Japan Atomic Power Co., operator of the facility. Full Article
Pam Radtke Russell | Roll Call
Given the threat of sequester, supporters of a $4.8 billion mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility worry that the Obama administration may be targeting the troubled nuclear reprocessing project in South Carolina for budget cuts. Full Article
|
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.