• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
Edition

Why the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Was Preventable

IN THIS ISSUE: Why Fukushima was preventable, Netanyahu and Obama still divided over Iran, EU's Ashton proposes new nuclear talks with Iran, Pakistan test fires nuclear capable ballistic missile, Syria tells IAEA of "delicate situation," proposed global laser enrichment plant.

Link Copied
Published on March 6, 2012

Proliferation News

Proliferation News is a biweekly newsletter highlighting the latest analysis and trends in the nuclear policy community.

Learn More
 
In This Issue
Why Fukushima Was Preventable
Carnegie paper
Netanyahu and Obama Still Divided Over Iran
National Journal
EU's Ashton Proposes New Nuclear Talks with Iran
Yahoo! News
Pakistan Test Fires Nuclear Capable Ballistic Missile
Nation
Syria Tells IAEA of Its "Delicate Situation"
Reuters
Safety, Environmental Reports Positive for Proposed Global Laser Enrichment Plant
Greater Wilmington Business Journal

Why Fukushima Was Preventable

James M. Acton and Mark Hibbs | Carnegie paper

Fukushima

Public sentiment in many states has turned against nuclear energy following the March 2011 accident at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. The large quantity of radioactive material released has caused significant human suffering and rendered large stretches of land uninhabitable. The cleanup operation will take decades and may cost hundreds of billions of dollars.

The Fukushima accident was, however, preventable. Had the plant's owner, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), and Japan's regulator, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA), followed international best practices and standards, it is conceivable that they would have predicted the possibility of the plant being struck by a massive tsunami. The plant would have withstood the tsunami had its design previously been upgraded in accordance with state-of-the-art safety approaches. Full Article



Follow the Nuclear Policy Program
RSS News Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Footer information begins here
More from Proliferation News


Netanyahu and Obama Still Divided Over Iran
Yochi J. Dreazen | National Journal
President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been working hard to present a united front on Iran, the nation at the heart of a simmering dispute between the two close allies. But there is no disguising the fact that the two leaders remain sharply divided on the way forward.     Full Article

EU's Ashton Proposes New Nuclear Talks with Iran
Laura Rozen | Yahoo! News
European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton has written Iran's top nuclear negotiator proposing new talks on its nuclear program as soon as possible. But Ashton stresses in her letter the talks should initially focus on agreeing to a confidence-building measure that could make way for sustained dialogue.     Full Article

Pakistan Test Fires Nuclear Capable Ballistic Missile
Nation
Pakistan successfully test fired a nuclear-capable, short-range, surface-to-surface ballistic missile on Monday, the military said. The Hatf-2 ballistic missile can travel up to 180 km, an army statement said. "Hatf-2 carries nuclear as well as conventional warheads with high accuracy."     Full Article

Syria Tells IAEA of Its "Delicate Situation"
Fredrik Dahl | Reuters
Syria has asked the IAEA for understanding of the country's "delicate situation" in response to requests for Syrian cooperation with an investigation into suspected illicit nuclear activity, agency chief Yukiya Amano said on Monday. Amano said he had written a letter to Syria in November last year urging it to address the agency's questions.     Full Article

Safety, Environmental Reports Positive for Proposed Global Laser Enrichment Plant
Jenny Callison | Greater Wilmington Business Journal
GE Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment LLC, known as GLE, is one step closer to developing a uranium enrichment facility in Wilmington. On Wednesday, the NRC issued its final technical safety evaluation report and environmental impact statement on the proposed laser-based uranium enrichment facility.    Full Article

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.