• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Ruslan Suleymanov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Carnegie Politika",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Politika: The Best of 2025"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Türkiye"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Security",
    "Global Governance",
    "Nuclear Energy",
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Politika

Russia-Türkiye Ties Falter Amid Stresses of Ukraine War

Mutual suspicion between Moscow and Ankara is growing as Türkiye cozies up to Washington and NATO while reducing its dependence on Russian energy.  

Link Copied
By Ruslan Suleymanov
Published on Nov 26, 2025
Carnegie Politika

Blog

Carnegie Politika

Carnegie Politika is a digital publication that features unmatched analysis and insight on Russia, Ukraine and the wider region. For nearly a decade, Carnegie Politika has published contributions from members of Carnegie’s global network of scholars and well-known outside contributors and has helped drive important strategic conversations and policy debates.

Learn More

It’s becoming increasingly difficult for Türkiye to successfully maneuver between Russia and the West. While trade between Russia and Türkiye nearly doubled in 2022 following Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, relations have since cooled, particularly in the oil, natural gas, and atomic energy sectors. Distrust has been fueled by Turkish arms exports to Kyiv, the seizure of power by pro-Turkish rebels in Syria, Moscow’s declining influence in the South Caucasus, and a recalibration of Türkiye’s role within NATO.

Türkiye has been involved in several military incidents as part of the fighting in Ukraine. On November 17, Russia attacked a Turkish-flagged LNG tanker moored in Odesa; in August, Russian missiles struck a factory being built near Kyiv to produce Turkish Bayraktar drones; and in August 2023, Russia fired warning shots at the Turkish ship Şükrü Okan that was sailing under a Palau flag in the Black Sea.

Moscow has repeatedly expressed its objection to Türkiye supplying arms to Kyiv. Türkiye, for its part as a mediator between Russia and Ukraine, is irritated by Russia’s approach to peace negotiations—particularly its maximalist demands and the low-level delegation it sent to Istanbul talks. Türkiye supports Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity, and backs Kyiv’s aspirations to join NATO. Ankara also insists Russian President Vladimir Putin must meet his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, for peace talks to progress: something the Kremlin rejects.   

Nevertheless, disagreements over Ukraine are only the tip of the iceberg. Despite repeated invitations, Putin has declined to visit Türkiye in recent years—likely because of the outstanding international arrest warrants in his name, the fact that Türkiye is a member of NATO, and a general mistrust of Ankara’s intentions.

In particular, mistrust has grown as calls grow for Türkiye to take a bigger role in European security, with many European officials pushing for greater defense cooperation. Both Germany and the United Kingdom recently approved the long-stalled sale of Eurofighter Typhoon jets to Türkiye, and, symbolically, the 2026 NATO summit will take place in Ankara.

In addition, the Kremlin is wary of warming ties between Washington and Ankara. Not only is Turkish President Recep Erdoğan hoping for further U.S. investment to help the country’s stuttering economy, he also wants U.S. assistance in the standoff with Syrian Kurds. Erdoğan would like the United States to either help Syria integrate the Kurds into the country’s new army—or greenlight a Turkish military operation against them inside Syria. Ankara is not particularly interested in the Kremlin’s opinion.  

Such engagement with the United States means it’s increasingly difficult for Ankara to resist pressure to comply with Western sanctions against Russia. In other words, Ankara is increasingly opting for Washington instead of Moscow.

Under former U.S. president Joe Biden, Ankara blocked the Russian payment system Mir, stopped sanctioned EU goods reaching Russia, and Turkish banks halted financial transactions with their Russian counterparts. Now Biden’s successor, Donald Trump, is demanding that Türkiye wean itself off of Russian oil. As a result, Russian oil exports to Türkiye fell more than 60 percent in October to 26,000 tons a day. In the week beginning November 3, they stopped altogether. October also saw volumes of Russian diesel bound for Turkish ports drop by 19 percent.

Russian natural gas exports have also declined. Over the last four years, Russia’s share of the Turkish natural gas market has shrunk from 45 percent to 36 percent. Increasingly, Türkiye is replacing Russian gas with LNG. In 2024, LNG met 31 percent of Türkiye’s gas needs, rising to 44 percent in the first quarter of 2025. In September, Ankara signed a $43 billion contract with U.S. company Mercuria to supply LNG over twenty years—which will obviously help further reduce Russian imports. Finally, Türkiye is seeking to boost domestic gas production.

It’s unsurprising, therefore, that negotiations between Moscow and Ankara over creating a gas hub in Türkiye appear to have collapsed. Russia’s state gas giant Gazprom has reportedly given up on this idea, which was first proposed by Putin in 2022.

Russia-Türkiye atomic energy ties are also on the rocks. Türkiye’s Akkuyu nuclear power plant, which is being built by the Russian nuclear power company Rosatom, was due to be launched last year, but that still hasn’t happened. It’s currently being held up by the refusal of German company Siemens to supply turbines due to sanctions against Russia, but Turkish media have also reported that Rosatom failed to provide planned financing.   

At the same time, Türkiye is negotiating with the United States over nuclear power cooperation. It’s possible that Ankara could hire a U.S. company to build the country’s second nuclear power plant, even though Rosatom said in 2024 that Erdoğan had offered it the project.

By courting Trump, Erdoğan is not only hoping for more U.S. investment and a new U.S. policy on Syria’s Kurds. He is also hoping Ankara will once again be involved in the production of the F-35 fighter (it was kicked out of the program in 2019 after buying Russia’s S-400 anti-aircraft system). While the Turkish military continues to operate S-400s, they appear to be of little practical use—if for no other reason than because they are incompatible with NATO standards.

Developments in other parts of the world have also fueled tensions. In the Middle East, it was the fall of the Moscow-backed regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria and the seizure of power by rebels supported by Türkiye. In the South Caucasus, Trump’s involvement in a joint peace declaration by Armenia and Azerbaijan strengthened the position of both Washington and Ankara at the cost of Russia’s influence there.

Russia-Türkiye cooperation has weakened so significantly over the last three years because of Russia’s enormous expenditure of resources on the war in Ukraine, Ankara’s drift toward Washington, an end to the so-called Astana Format (made up of Russia, Türkiye, and Iran) set up to address the fighting in Syria, and the diversification of Türkiye’s foreign trade. The annual trade turnover between Russia and Türkiye increased 90 percent in 2022 to $65 billion. By 2024, it had fallen to $52.6 billion, and China had replaced Russia as Türkiye’s main source of imports.

Of course, Moscow and Ankara still have a significant economic relationship—from atomic energy to oil and gas. It would therefore be impossible for them to fully break with one another overnight, even if they wanted to. It’s the same when it comes to international affairs, where Russian and Turkish interests are entangled in the South Caucasus, Syria, and Libya. But the scale of their bilateral ties is shrinking—and fast.

About the Author

Ruslan Suleymanov

Non-resident research fellow, the Institute for Development and Diplomacy (Azerbaijan)

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Once Neutral on the Ukraine War, Arab States Increasingly Favor Moscow

      Ruslan Suleymanov

  • Commentary
    From Wanted Man to Kremlin Guest: Russia Welcomes Syria’s New Leader

      Ruslan Suleymanov

Ruslan Suleymanov

Non-resident research fellow, the Institute for Development and Diplomacy (Azerbaijan)

Ruslan Suleymanov
Foreign PolicySecurityGlobal GovernanceNuclear EnergyClimate ChangeRussiaTürkiye

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Politika

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

    The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”: A Deep Dive Into Russian Propaganda

    Talankin and Borenstein’s documentary is a unique inside look at a regime that threatens the world and has killed thousands of people in its neighboring country. And many critics and general viewers alike draw parallels between the Putin regime and their own governments.

      Ekaterina Barabash

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Did Messaging App Telegram Fall From Grace in Russia?

    The history of Telegram’s relations with the Russian state offers a salutary lesson for international platforms that believe they can reach a compromise with the Kremlin.

      Maria Kolomychenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Nuances of Oscar-Winning Film “Mr. Nobody Against Putin”

    It’s disingenuous to criticize a film for simplifying Russia’s complexities when Russia is waging a brutally simple war of aggression against its neighbor.

      Alexander Baunov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.