Feature
The Disaster Dollar Database is a tool that tracks the major sources of federal funding for disaster recovery in the United States.
{
"authors": [
"Sarah Labowitz"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [
"Climate Mobility",
"Climate Disasters and Adaptation"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SCP",
"programs": [
"Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"United States"
],
"topics": [
"Domestic Politics",
"Climate Change"
]
}
A woman sorts through debris on May 18, 2025, in Kentucky after a tornado hit the area. (Photo by Michael Swensen/Getty Images)
Commentary
Updating the Disaster Dollar Database
Our goal is to create practical tools for people living through disasters and rebuilding their communities in more resilient ways.
Published on Jun 25, 2025
In the context of a very grim picture for hurricane season 2025, we’ve updated the Disaster Dollar Database with a new interface and fresh data, for disasters through May 2025.
Going forward, we aim to update the DDD twice a year—in June and December, the beginning and end of hurricane season. We’ll also update it if Congress makes an emergency appropriation for disaster recovery through the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Community Development Block Grant Program for Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR).
To make improvements to the interface, we consulted with disaster survivors, advocates, and researchers about how they’re using the data. They told us that they’re screenshotting the data, so we made a fact-sheet generator to give users more control over the information that’s relevant to them. We also heard that people are using the data to compare recovery funding for similar kinds of disasters—for example, comparing the LA wildfires in January to previous fires, in order to understand how many people applied for assistance or how much funding individuals typically received. In the new interface, you now can select disasters by type.
When we launched the database, one of the tools we were especially excited about was the index of HUD grantees. In the spreadsheet version of the data, you can find the state, local, tribal, or territory government that received funding from HUD for disaster recovery, along with the specific disaster webpage. People weren’t finding this data, so we’ve made it more visible in the fact-sheet generator.
One line of inquiry we’re following is a possible rise in AI-generated fake FEMA applications that may be pushing the numbers of valid FEMA applications artificially high for recent disasters. We’re evaluating the evidence and looking for alternative metrics in the OpenFEMA dataset that give us insight into how many people are seeking assistance. In the December update, we’ll report back on what we’ve found.
If you’re finding this data useful or have ideas for how to improve it, we’d love to hear from you. Email us at climate@ceip.org. In an unpredictable policy and funding environment for disaster recovery, our goal is to create practical tools for people living through disasters and rebuilding their communities in more resilient ways.
Tracking U.S. Federal Disaster Spending: The Disaster Dollar Database
About the Author
Sarah Labowitz
Senior Fellow, Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics Program
Sarah Labowitz is a senior fellow in the Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics Program whose work lies at the intersection of climate, national security, and democracy.
- Reimagining Disaster Response in the Age of Chaotic AusterityArticle
Sarah Labowitz, Katie Mears
- Can Mullin Revive FEMA?Commentary
Sarah Labowitz, Debbra Goh
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Vučić’s Downfall in Serbia Is Fatal to Russia’s Influence in the BalkansCommentary
The new Serbian leadership may have promised to keep on cooperating with Russia, but soon they will have to make a choice between fighting corruption and sealing lucrative deals with Moscow. The two are mutually exclusive, even if the new leaders in Belgrade haven’t yet realized it.
Maksim Samorukov
- How Did Serbia Remove Vučić Without a Single Smashed Window?Commentary
Serbia’s electoral earthquake is an extremely rare example of an entire political system being defeated by street protesters who played by the rules.
Alexander Baunov
- The Foundations of a Russian Dictatorship: The Kremlin’s New IdeologyPaper
The concept authored by Sergei Kiriyenko and his team can be considered not only an apologia for the Putin regime, but also a blueprint for Russia’s future configuration.
Andrey Pertsev
- Putin’s Post-Election Reshuffle Advances Russian State ErosionCommentary
The pressures of war are gradually warping Russia’s system of governance, making it more vulnerable to a future crisis.
Tatiana Stanovaya
- Ukrainian Drone Attacks Reveal the Cost of Russia’s “Sovereign Internet” CampaignCommentary
Russia spent years building a “sovereign internet,” concentrating web infrastructure exclusively within Russian territory. Ukrainian drone attacks have shown how vulnerable that approach has left the Russian internet.
Maria Kolomychenko
