• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Jin Liangxiang",
    "Maha Yahya",
    "Hesham Alghannam"
  ],
  "type": "questionAnswer",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Carnegie China Commentaries"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": []
}
Q&A
Carnegie China

China’s Evolving Economic and Security Role in the Middle East

The advantage that China has over other global powers, especially America, is that its foreign policy is closely aligned with those of many of the Middle Eastern countries.

Link Copied
By Jin Liangxiang, Maha Yahya, Hesham Alghannam
Published on Mar 20, 2024

This Q&A was adapted from a Carnegie China live event assessing China–Middle East relations. It has been edited for clarity.

Jin Liangxiang: The Middle East is an important market for China’s products and a major source for Chinese investment. Peace and stability are an important part of China’s Middle East policy. It wants the market to be stable.

Also, China cares about its international image as a responsible major country. Arab and Western countries, including the United States, often claim that China should play a responsible role in the Middle East. China is living up to this commitment, but it has a different way of defining its responsibilities.

On regional security issues, China emphasizes common, cooperative, comprehensive, and sustainable security. The American way of promoting security in the Middle East has failed. The Americans say that they will protect Saudi Arabia, but this puts Iran on the other side. Iran is not satisfied with being targeted by the United States. China’s principle is different. [It] thinks that security should be common and comprehensive.

Security issues should be resolved by regional countries themselves. Outsiders can push regional countries to engage in dialogue, particularly by leveraging economic and political capital. That is the way to make peace and security.

Saudi-Iran reconciliation has been very important for the Middle East. There are many conflicts in the region, but tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia are one of the defining features. By facilitating reconciliation, China has helped maintain a modest degree of stability in the region. It stopped the confrontation between Saudi Arabi and Iran in Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Syria, and Bahrain. This has benefited Saudi Arabia greatly. Saudi Arabia has strong interests in reconciliation with Iran because of its ambitious plan for Vision 2030. Without reconciliation, Saudi Arabia cannot realize this agenda. Reconciliation has led many people to see the prospect for stability in the region.

Our friends in Saudi Arabia sometimes complain that China has closer relations with Iran. But when we are in Iran, they ask why we side with Saudi Arabia. Both arguments are wrong. China tries to maintain balanced and good relations with both countries.

Maha Yahya: Dr. Alghannam, having heard what Dr. Jin said, particularly regarding China’s interests in economic stability and stability in the region, what would you say are the key security concerns in the Middle East and how does China fit into the regional security landscape?

Hesham Alghannam: First is the ongoing Israeli occupation of Palestinian Arab land, which has escalated tensions in the region and brought it to the brink of a broader conflict beyond Gaza and the West Bank. Second, there is the issue of the spread of nuclear weapons in the region. Israel already possesses nuclear weapons, and Iran is nearing a nuclear capability. This will encourage others, including the Turks and the Saudis, to pursue nuclear armament. Third, the existence of numerous armed nonstate actors backed by Iran poses a threat to Arab states and undermines stability across the region.

Addressing these strategic security challenges requires a comprehensive strategy. For instance, resolving the Iranian nuclear program necessitates addressing Israel’s nuclear capability. Similarly, tackling the proliferation of armed nonstate actors requires addressing the root causes that enable their existence.

However, the current approach, such as the NATO-like defense pact proposed by the United States, does not offer comprehensive solutions to ongoing security concerns. While such pacts may enhance Saudi Arabia’s security, they do not address the core security issues.

In contrast, China advocates a different approach to regional security. It emphasizes cooperation between Saudi Arabia and Iran. This approach has led to significant mediation efforts aimed at reconciling the two states.

Unlike the United States, China has shown no interest in establishing military bases in the region until now. China’s political involvement in the region remains limited. However, like the United States, China lacks a comprehensive strategy that addresses the main security challenges in the region, such as the ending the conflict in Gaza.

The advantage that China has over other global powers, especially America, is that its foreign policy is closely aligned with those of many of the Middle Eastern countries. Unlike the United States, China’s foreign policy principles are grounded in values such as respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, nonaggression, noninterference, mutual benefit, and peaceful existence. China also refrains from interference under the pretext of protecting human rights or promoting democracy. It has avoided employing double standards in international relations. This is how many states in the region view China, so it is not strange that China’s foreign policy is more attractive to leaders in the Middle East.

Authors

Jin Liangxiang

Jin Liangxiang is a senior research fellow at Shanghai Institutes of International Studies.

Jin Liangxiang
Maha Yahya
Director, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Maha Yahya
Hesham Alghannam
Nonresident Scholar, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Hesham Alghannam
Middle EastEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: What Issue Is Europe Ignoring at Its Peril in 2026?

    2026 has started in crisis, as the actions of unpredictable leaders shape an increasingly volatile global environment. To shift from crisis response to strategic foresight, what under-the-radar issues should the EU prepare for in the coming year?

      Thomas de Waal

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    China Is the Weak Link in Europe’s Ukraine Strategy

    China plays an increasingly active role in the Kremlin’s hybrid war against Europe. The EU must confront this growing China-Russia cooperation, as it poses grave threats to both European security and economic resilience.

      Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Has Europe Given Up its Leadership on Climate Change?

    COP30 takes place amidst increased pessimism about the world’s commitment to energy transition and ecological protection. Beset by a host of other challenges, can Europe still maintain its role as a driver of global climate action?

      Thomas de Waal

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How the EU’s Global Gateway Can Compete in the Global South

    In competition with China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the Global Gateway strategy needs to find an edge. To better promote its interests through investment, the EU’s offer must become more coherent, transparent, and accountable.

      Ceren Ergenc, Chaofan Yu

  • Commentary
    Erdoğan and Trump: Affinity over Discord

    Erdoğan and Trump’s meeting served both leaders’ domestic and personal agendas. For Europe, it highlights how America’s transactional approach risks sidelining allies and empowering authoritarians.

      Marc Pierini

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.