Commentary
As we close out another season of Strategic Europe, it is worth taking stock of the deep shifts underway.
Rym Momtaz
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Press Release
Press Release: Russia and the E.U.: What Makes a "Strategic Partnership?"
The Carnegie Endowment announces a Carnegie Paper by visiting scholar Rolf Schuette that argues that relations between the E.U. and Russia cannot develop into a full-fledged "strategic partnership," if they are based only on common interests and not also on common values and mutual trust.
Published on Dec 21, 2004
Contact: Carmen MacDougall, 202-939-2319, cmacdougall@CarnegieEndowment.org
For Immediate Release: December 21, 2004
This fall European criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s policies reached a new high, as critics saw the political measures he announced after the Beslan terrorist attack as exploiting the events to further curtail democracy. Doubts about Russia’s commitment to “common European values,” one of the bedrocks of the partnership between the two actors, are gaining momentum. Visiting scholar Rolf Schuette argues that relations between the E.U. and Russia cannot develop into a full-fledged “strategic partnership,” if they are based only on common interests and not also on common values and mutual trust. Read E.U. - Russia Relations: Interests and Values – A European Perspective here.
The Carnegie Paper reviews E.U.-Russia relations from a European perspective, examining how the common values of democracy, human rights, and rule of law have figured in the relationship. The first section analyzes the formulation of E.U. policy towards Russia and then outlines the structure and four main areas of E.U.-Russian cooperation. Schuette points out that the E.U. and Russia have a unique relationship based on years of intensive dialogue and geographical proximity. Natural partners, they complement each other most clearly in the areas of trade, investment and energy. Though recent developments seem discouraging, the E.U. should not give up its efforts to counter troublesome trends that contradict the common values to which Russia previously committed.
Specifically, Schuette suggests that the E.U. send a clear, consistent message in its dialogue with Russia, saying that:
- Dialogue and cooperation will continue. There will be no return to Cold War antagonism.
- Both sides can discuss any concern brought to the table. No matter can be vetoed.
- Russia can expect support in its fight against terrorism, but not a “discount” when it disregards human rights in Chechnya or uses terrorism as a pretext for curbing democracy.
- The E.U. will continue to raise concerns about Russia’s violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms in appropriate international forums.
- Respect for Russia comes only when it complies with the common European values.
Rolf Schuette was a visiting scholar in the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie Endowment during the fall of 2004. He is a career diplomat in the German Foreign Service and was also the head of the Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova division in the Foreign Office in Berlin. The paper expresses his personal opinion and not official position.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Letter from the Editor: Europe Takes Two Steps Forward But One Step Back
- Assessing Information Ecosystems: How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid ThreatsPaper
The hybrid warfare landscape is evolving rapidly, leaving policymakers without clear strategies. To better inform their work in addressing emerging challenges, governments must dig deeper into the underlying dynamics at play.
Raluca Csernatoni, Alicia Wanless
- Taking the Pulse: Are the EU’s Watered-Down Russia Sanctions Better than None?Commentary
The EU had to compromise to adopt a twenty-first sanctions package against Russia, exposing growing cracks in the union’s resolve. Is this latest, weaker round worth it to keep pressure on Moscow?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Why Europe Must Take Charge of its Russia Diplomacy NowCommentary
Trump is distracted and Ukraine wants Europe to step up. The continent’s leaders must find their voice and assert it in talks with Russia.
Alissa de Carbonnel
- Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against EuropeCommentary
Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.
Maksym Beznosiuk
