Paper
Douglas H. Paal
{
"authors": [
"Douglas H. Paal"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"South Asia",
"India"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Our Ties are Important, but not Exclusive
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's upcoming visit to the U.S. will bolster prospects for long-term bilateral cooperation, especially on such issues as globalization, terrorism, and nuclear nonproliferation.
Published on Oct 12, 2009
Source: Daily News & Analysis
The first state visit under the Obama administration is rich with symbolism. It comes with Obama's travel to China, and is a reinforcement of America's friendship with India on the eve of dealing with the Chinese on the major issues. It will solidify the US-Indian relationship under a Democratic president, whose administration has many officials who were skeptical of the nuclear agreement. The visit will be a test of India's willingness to follow through with concrete acquisitions of civilian nuclear technology, and to agree to a test ban.
Under Obama's presidency, Pakistan appears to have surpassed India as America's best friend in South Asia. [What are your thoughts?]
The Obama administration early on learned to de-hyphenate India and Pakistan. The challenges facing Pakistan's survival from within are driving relations there and are of a more urgent nature than the slowly but steadily developing relationship with India. For Americans and Europeans, the terrorist origins in Pakistan are as alarming as they are to Indians.
Are China and Pakistan worried by India's expanding military ambitions?
It's difficult to decouple our cooperation with India from Pakistani fears of Indian long-term intentions. The US is trying to do so, nonetheless. With China, the narrative is more interesting and possibly worrisome. As China has grown richer and better armed, it's grown seemingly dismissive of India, at least in circles where chests are full of pride at China's rise. China's leaders seem more sober, but they cannot be immune to feelings provoked by their people's sentiment and the strong language of Indian commentators on China.
Will US policymakers be disappointed when they realise India won't be a lieutenant for US interests?
US officials understand well, perhaps better than some in the Bush administration, that India is pursuing improvements in its external circumstances along every azimuth. Our relationship is important, and increasingly so, but it is not exclusive in either direction. Both nations are pursuing their interests with a cool eye and a sense of balance. This is a healthy basis for long-term cooperation where our interests coincide.
Does Delhi underestimate how much Washington depends on it as a 'natural ally'?
For the US, 'ally' is a formal, legally binding term that is not viewed as appropriate in describing Washington-Delhi relations. We and India share concerns about the terrorist threats we face. We have a common interest in globalisation occurring in an orderly fashion and a host of other issues. In those efforts, our allied efforts will be critical.
About the Author
Douglas H. Paal
Distinguished Fellow, Asia Program
Paal previously served as vice chairman of JPMorgan Chase International and as unofficial U.S. representative to Taiwan as director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
- America’s Future in a Dynamic Asia
- U.S.-China Relations at the Forty-Year MarkQ&A
- +1
Douglas H. Paal, Tong Zhao, Chen Qi, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?Commentary
Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Time to Merge the Commission and EEASCommentary
The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.
Stefan Lehne
- Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic OpportunityCommentary
The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.
William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk
- Is the Radical-Right Threat Existential or Overstated?Commentary
Amid increased polarization and the influence of disinformation, radical-right parties are once again gaining traction across Europe. With landmark elections on the horizon in several countries, are the EU’s geostrategic vision and fundamental values under existential threat?
Catherine Fieschi, Cas Mudde
- Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come TogetherCommentary
The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.
Rym Momtaz
