Douglas H. Paal
{
"authors": [
"Douglas H. Paal"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"South Asia",
"India"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Our Ties are Important, but not Exclusive
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's upcoming visit to the U.S. will bolster prospects for long-term bilateral cooperation, especially on such issues as globalization, terrorism, and nuclear nonproliferation.
Source: Daily News & Analysis

The first state visit under the Obama administration is rich with symbolism. It comes with Obama's travel to China, and is a reinforcement of America's friendship with India on the eve of dealing with the Chinese on the major issues. It will solidify the US-Indian relationship under a Democratic president, whose administration has many officials who were skeptical of the nuclear agreement. The visit will be a test of India's willingness to follow through with concrete acquisitions of civilian nuclear technology, and to agree to a test ban.
Under Obama's presidency, Pakistan appears to have surpassed India as America's best friend in South Asia. [What are your thoughts?]
The Obama administration early on learned to de-hyphenate India and Pakistan. The challenges facing Pakistan's survival from within are driving relations there and are of a more urgent nature than the slowly but steadily developing relationship with India. For Americans and Europeans, the terrorist origins in Pakistan are as alarming as they are to Indians.
Are China and Pakistan worried by India's expanding military ambitions?
It's difficult to decouple our cooperation with India from Pakistani fears of Indian long-term intentions. The US is trying to do so, nonetheless. With China, the narrative is more interesting and possibly worrisome. As China has grown richer and better armed, it's grown seemingly dismissive of India, at least in circles where chests are full of pride at China's rise. China's leaders seem more sober, but they cannot be immune to feelings provoked by their people's sentiment and the strong language of Indian commentators on China.
Will US policymakers be disappointed when they realise India won't be a lieutenant for US interests?
US officials understand well, perhaps better than some in the Bush administration, that India is pursuing improvements in its external circumstances along every azimuth. Our relationship is important, and increasingly so, but it is not exclusive in either direction. Both nations are pursuing their interests with a cool eye and a sense of balance. This is a healthy basis for long-term cooperation where our interests coincide.
Does Delhi underestimate how much Washington depends on it as a 'natural ally'?
For the US, 'ally' is a formal, legally binding term that is not viewed as appropriate in describing Washington-Delhi relations. We and India share concerns about the terrorist threats we face. We have a common interest in globalisation occurring in an orderly fashion and a host of other issues. In those efforts, our allied efforts will be critical.
About the Author
Distinguished Fellow, Asia Program
Paal previously served as vice chairman of JPMorgan Chase International and as unofficial U.S. representative to Taiwan as director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
- America’s Future in a Dynamic AsiaPaper
- U.S.-China Relations at the Forty-Year MarkQ&A
- +1
Douglas H. Paal, Tong Zhao, Chen Qi, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- The Denmark-Greenland-U.S. Agreement Needs to Stand the Test of TimeCommentary
The new U.S.–Denmark–Greenland agreement will help Washington exert political, economic, and financial dominance under the guise of security. Yet, it acknowledged Copenhagen’s and Nuuk’s sovereignty on the island.
Marc Pierini
- A Black Sea Truce Is About Global Food Security, TooCommentary
A summer of escalation in the Black Sea has hurt Ukraine economically and is exacerbating world food security. A truce is needed—as is a broader reframing of Europe’s Ukraine strategy.
Thomas de Waal
- Taking the Pulse: Does the EU Have a Germany Problem?Commentary
Are Germany’s economic, industrial, and political struggles becoming a liability for the EU’s ability to rise to the geopolitical moment?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The Speech Ursula von der Leyen Can’t DeliverCommentary
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is about to give her annual address on the state of the EU. Here’s what she won’t—but should—say.
Rym Momtaz
- How Europe’s 2027 Elections Could Test EU GovernanceArticle
Radical-right parties are expected to do well in upcoming elections in four of the EU's biggest member states. If successful, they could prevent the union from addressing key challenges ahead.
Stefan Lehne