• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Taiya M. Smith"
  ],
  "type": "testimony",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia",
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Testimony

International Climate Change Policy

As the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, China will be central to efforts to combat global climate change at Copenhagen and beyond.

Link Copied
By Taiya M. Smith
Published on Nov 17, 2009

Source: Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

Please Download Flash

As the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, China will be central to efforts to combat global climate change at Copenhagen and beyond. In testimony before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Taiya Smith explains that China is serious about addressing climate change, and assesses the implications and opportunities presented by its recent efforts to reduce carbon emissions at home.

Current realties in China:

  • China’s actions to address climate change should be taken seriously. To maintain national stability and GDP growth, China has concluded that it must address environmental degradation and climate change. Additionally, China long ago concluded that reliance on foreign oil creates considerable political difficulties.
     
  • If present trends continue, China is on pace to meet its emissions targets: reducing energy intensity by 20 percent between 2005 and 2010, obtaining 15 percent of the nation’s energy supply from non-fossil fuels by 2020, and increasing forest coverage and stock volumes 20 percent above 2005 levels by 2020.

U.S. Policy Recommendations:

  • Establishing an international body that allows countries to monitor one another’s emissions and provides a mechanism (similar to the WTO) to resolve disputes could be one of the most effective ways to both ensure that China develops a strong internal monitoring system and that the international community can engage with China on the data that it issues.
     
  • Access to the joint American-Chinese market will be a critical motivator for the development and dissemination of clean technology. The United States needs to work with the Chinese to ensure that we keep our markets open to each other by creating policies that encourage competition in clean technology. Specifically, our two countries need to:
    • Develop shared standards for new technology;
    • Drop barriers to access and investment in each other’s markets;
    • Implement the right set of incentives to encourage competition in this rapidly expanding sector.
       

About the Author

Taiya M. Smith

Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program, Asia Program

Smith has spent the last decade working in international negotiations. Most recently, she served as a member of Secretary Hank Paulson’s senior management team from 2006 to 2009 as the deputy chief of staff and executive secretary for the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

    Recent Work

  • Other
    Why Go Strategic?: The Value of a Truly Strategic Dialogue Between the United States and China

      Taiya M. Smith

  • Article
    After Copenhagen

      Uri Dadush, Vera Eidelman, Taiya M. Smith

Taiya M. Smith
Former Senior Associate, Energy and Climate Program, Asia Program
Taiya M. Smith
Climate ChangeNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    The Iran War’s Dangerous Fallout for Europe

    The drone strike on the British air base in Akrotiri brings Europe’s proximity to the conflict in Iran into sharp relief. In the fog of war, old tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean risk being reignited, and regional stakeholders must avoid escalation.

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Needs a Third Way in Iran

    European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.

      Richard Youngs

  • Trump United Nations multilateralism institutions 2236462680
    Article
    Resetting Cyber Relations with the United States

    For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.

      • Christopher Painter

      Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.