Research
- +11
Frances Z. Brown, Nate Reynolds, Priyal Singh, …
{
"authors": [
"Andrew S. Weiss"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [
"Eurasia in Transition"
],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Middle East",
"Syria",
"Russia",
"Levant"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Foreign Policy",
"Global Governance"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Can Syria’s Chemical Arsenal Be Destroyed?
Moscow and Washington face the tough task of coming up with an enforcement mechanism to secure Syria’s chemical weapons that outlines possible consequences if Assad reneges or cheats on the deal.
Published on Sep 11, 2013
Source: New York Times
No one should harbor any illusions that Russian President Vladimir Putin enjoys magical influence over Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Nor should one assume that Putin is going to be in a position to force a deal on securing Syria's chemical weapons down Assad’s throat. Putin, like President Obama, is clearly improvising as he tries to forestall U.S. military action.
This week's negotiation between Secretary of State John Kerry and Russia’s very capable foreign minister Sergey Lavrov has high-stakes. The goal is to come up with parameters for international supervision, monitoring, and, ultimately, the verified destruction of Syria’s vast arsenal of chemical weapons. Doing that kind of work in the middle of a civil war in a way that meets Kerry’s yardstick (“It has to be swift, it has to be real, it has to be verifiable. It cannot be a delaying tactic.”) will be enormously challenging for all the reasons that various experts have been offering in recent days. Mr. Lavrov, a veteran of the endless wrangling in New York over the United Nations monitoring of Iraq’s "weapons of mass destruction" programs back in the 1990s, knows these issues cold.The hardest part, almost certainly, will be to come up with an enforcement mechanism, ideally embodied in a United Nations Security Council resolution, outlining possible consequences in the event that Assad reneges or cheats on the deal, which seems likely. As Putin’s brief comments on Tuesday illustrated, Russia’s long-standing opposition to any form of military action remains firm. Moscow will not permit the type of U.N. resolutions that created the legal basis for U.S.-led coalition airstrikes against Saddam Hussein during the 1990s let alone the more recent example of Libya. Russia abstained from the March 2011 resolution aimed at protecting vulnerable Libyan civilians when Muammar el-Qaddafi was still in power.
Squaring these kinds of circles is the essence of diplomacy. Whether Kerry and Lavrov can get there is truly anyone’s guess at this point.
This article was originally published in the New York Times.
About the Author
Andrew S. Weiss
James Family Chair, Vice President for Studies
Andrew S. Weiss is the James Family Chair and vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he oversees research on Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia. His graphic novel biography of Vladimir Putin, Accidental Czar: the Life and Lies of Vladimir Putin, was published by First Second/Macmillan in 2022.
- Russia in Africa: Examining Moscow’s Influence and Its Limits
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security StrategyOther
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- The Fog of AI WarCommentary
In Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran, AI warfare has come to dominate, with barely any oversight or accountability. Europe must lead the charge on the responsible use of new military technologies.
Raluca Csernatoni
- How to Join the EU in Three Easy StepsCommentary
Montenegro and Albania are frontrunners for EU enlargement in the Western Balkans, but they can’t just sit back and wait. To meet their 2030 accession ambitions, they must make a strong positive case.
Dimitar Bechev, Iliriana Gjoni
- Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?Commentary
Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing ItCommentary
Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.
Rym Momtaz
- Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good ReasonsCommentary
The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.
Marc Pierini
