• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Security"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Religion of a Gunman

Terrorism is hardly to be found in a traditional religious society, consisting of people who are brought up and educated there, who know this tradition, its texts and practices, and whose life is religiously integral rather than separated into religious and profane parts.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Sep 25, 2013

On September 21, 2013, a group of attackers entered the Westgate Shopping Center in Nairobi, Kenya. They opened fire and began throwing grenades at the crowd of shoppers. It was the beginning of a half-a-week siege, which left over sixty people dead. On the next day, two suicide bombers attacked the All Saints Church in Peshawar, Pakistan. More than eighty people were killed.

In Nairobi and Peshawar there were groups behind these attacks which associated themselves with Islam. In both the mall and the church mostly non-Muslims were targeted. It makes some people come to the simple conclusion that “Muslims are fully capable of attacking a church and killing innocent Pakistanis, just like Christians, when they fought their battles of faith, destroyed churches and burned heretics.” This comparison of contemporary terrorist activities with the wars of religions is a mere commonplace. Yet it is not reflective of the reality of either wars of religion or terrorism. Such wars were rather for power and influence in Europe than for religious principles. Furthermore, the age of wars of religion resulted in secularism coming.

Terrorism is hardly to be found in a traditional religious society, consisting of people who are brought up and educated there, who know this tradition, its texts and practices, and whose life is religiously integral rather than separated into religious and profane parts. Who can say now that he or she regards every breath as a religious act? A tiny number of hermits, may be. But if they have a weapon, it would be a prayer or charitable act rather than a gun. It does not mean that there is no violence in traditional religious societies. It does exist there, yet this is not the terrorism.

In the post-secular world where we live now, people are free to mix some elements of religions with everything else which could be very far from the religious tradition. This looks like a shopper who takes what he or she likes at the moment. That is why today religion can be found side by side with insolence, hatred, and animosity.

If Christians of the Medieval Russia used to help those who were in prisons, knowing the words of Jesus Christ: “I was in prison and you came to Me” (Matthew 25:36), today many people formally belonging to the Orthodox Christian Church do not want to show mercy to Pussy Riot’s Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and others who are in the Russian prisons which are notorious for their inhuman living conditions.

It would be impossible in a traditional religious society to justify the Pussy Riot performances as well as the malicious joy demonstrated by others regarding the bad consequences for the women from this group. In the same way it is impossible to regard the attacks in Nairobi and Peshawar as religious acts. These terrorists are not Muslims. They are just criminals who know almost nothing about Islam.

About the Author

Petr Topychkanov

Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center

Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.

    Recent Work

  • Report
    Entanglement: Chinese and Russian Perspectives on Non-nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Risks
      • +3

      James M. Acton, Alexey Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, …

  • In The Media
    Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System

      Petr Topychkanov

Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
Security

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Does the EU Have a Germany Problem?

    Are Germany’s economic, industrial, and political struggles becoming a liability for the EU’s ability to rise to the geopolitical moment?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Pituffik base greenland US Denmark
    Article
    Europe’s Overseas Countries and Territories as Geopolitical Assets

    European states control several Overseas Countries and Territories around the world that carry strategic, economic, and environmental weight. As great powers challenge the rules-based order, defending them is a geopolitical imperative for Europe.

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against Europe

    Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.

      Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?

    Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Romania Bulgaria Turkey Black Sea naval
    Commentary
    How NATO Became Anchored in the Black Sea

    As Russia's war on Ukraine drags on, NATO is expanding its footprint in the Black Sea. Turkey, Romania, and Bulgaria are upgrading their fleets and deepening trilateral cooperation.

      Dimitar Bechev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.