C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah
{
"authors": [
"C. Raja Mohan"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie India"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"United States",
"South Asia",
"India",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Day 3: India, U.S. Ready to Talk To—Not At—Each Other
As they ended their three-day summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Barack Obama had every reason to feel vindicated that their political bet on each other had paid off handsomely.
Source: Indian Express
As they ended their three-day summit with a joint radio broadcast, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Barack Obama had every reason to feel vindicated that their political bet on each other had paid off handsomely.
Modi went for broke in finding a way to renew the momentum in the partnership with America, which he saw as central to his foreign and domestic strategies. Obama moved quickly after Modi’s election to end US antipathy towards the former chief minister of Gujarat, and invited him to the White House.
Once they found they could do business, they went full tilt at addressing outstanding issues like the civil nuclear initiative, reviving the stalled defence cooperation, exploring common ground on climate change, and expanding economic cooperation.As they tweeted on Tuesday afternoon — Modi bidding goodbye and Obama thanking his host — the two leaders demonstrated an unprecedented level of personal comfort.
If Obama has been widely acknowledged as a master of public communication, he met his match in Modi. Unlike his recent predecessors, who were stiff and formal in their engagement with world leaders, Modi understands the value of personal chemistry in shaping political outcomes.
Obama’s record on India in the seventh year at the White House now looks rather impressive. Contrary to the widespread perception that he is not warm towards India, Obama hosted Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as the first state guest at the White House in 2009. He is also the only US president to have visited India twice.
If George W Bush is rightly credited with re-imagining the relationship with India, Obama has advanced it beyond anyone’s expectations. Whatever his initial reservations about the civil nuclear initiative, Obama has helped wrap up what Bush had started.
Despite his initial belief that a resolution of the Kashmir question will help stabilise Afghanistan, Obama quickly moved away from the temptation to meddle in India-Pak disputes. After the failure of his overtures towards China early on in his presidency, Obama put India at the forefront of his pivot to Asia. He also became the first American president to support India’s claim to be a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
On the last day of his trip, Obama clearly articulated the unlimited possibilities for America and India in jointly promoting mutual prosperity, regional security and a stable global order. As he celebrated the virtues of Indian democracy, Obama also cautioned his hosts against the emerging threats to its cultural and religious pluralism.
Obama affirmed that India’s ability to continually affirm its democracy amidst so much diversity, is an example “for every other country on Earth”.
That Obama’s remarks were widely seen as unexceptionable in India is a testimony to the new maturity of the relationship. India and America are now ready to talk to each other frankly and in a spirit of genuine friendship rather than at each other.
This article was originally published in the Indian Express.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.
- Deepening the India-France Maritime PartnershipArticle
- Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New DelhiCommentary
- +1
Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?Commentary
Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Time to Merge the Commission and EEASCommentary
The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.
Stefan Lehne
- Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic OpportunityCommentary
The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.
William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk
- Is the Radical-Right Threat Existential or Overstated?Commentary
Amid increased polarization and the influence of disinformation, radical-right parties are once again gaining traction across Europe. With landmark elections on the horizon in several countries, are the EU’s geostrategic vision and fundamental values under existential threat?
Catherine Fieschi, Cas Mudde
- Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come TogetherCommentary
The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.
Rym Momtaz