• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "Pakistan",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Modi’s Cricket Diplomacy: Renewing Political Contact With Pakistan

Cricket has always come in handy to the leaders of India and Pakistan to break political ice at difficult moments in bilateral relations, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent outreach follows this trend.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Feb 13, 2015

Source: Indian Express

Cricket has always come in handy for the leaders of India and Pakistan to signal good will towards each other and break political ice at difficult moments in bilateral relations.

So it has for Prime Minister Narendra Modi who suspended the dialogue last August when Pakistan’s high commissioner in Delhi got in touch with the Kashmiri separatist leaders just before the Indian foreign secretary was to travel to travel to Islamabad.

While Pakistan saw it as a routine consultation with the Hurriyat leaders, the Modi government signalled that it will not accept any role for the Kashmiri separatist groups in the India-Pakistan dialogue.

Delhi’s capricious move at once reversed the bonhomie that Modi had generated with Nawaz Sharif when the Pakistani PM joined other South Asian leaders at the swearing in ceremony of the new Indian government last May.

Whatever the political logic behind the suspension, it had become increasingly counter productive for the Modi government to be seen as resisting a dialogue with Pakistan. Islamabad has been portraying Modi as intransigent and was mounting pressure on the international community to push Delhi towards a dialogue.

Although the U.S. President Barack Obama did not publicly bring up the question of resuming the India-Pakistan dialogue, it is believed the two leaders had talked about the issue during their conversation at the Hyderabad House on the eve of the Republic Day celebrations.

On his part, Modi apparently reaffirmed his commitment to the peace process and his readiness to engage Islamabad in a framework that responds to Delhi’s concerns on cross-border terrorism, is focused on expansive economic cooperation, and avoids the kind of posturing that Islamabad does on Kashmir.

Modi reminded Obama of his quick and empathetic response to the horrible terror attack on a school in Peshawar last December and his deep disappointment at the reports that Pakistan was going to release the main plotter of the 26/11 attacks on Mumbai.

It was not just Obama who was urging Modi to renew the dialogue with Pakistan. In his address to the Indian envoys last week, President Pranab Mukherjee reminded the government of the need to revitalise its regional peace overtures.

The opening of the World Cup this weekend provided Modi with an opportunity to end the current diplomatic impasse with Pakistan. He called up Sharif to wish Pakistan well in the World Cup and offered to send the new foreign secretary Dr. S. Jaishankar to Islamabad.

The PM was careful to present the outreach to Pakistan as part of extending good will to all the five South Asian nations participating in the World Cup. Dr. Jaishankar’s trip to Pakistan is also being billed as part of the foreign secretary’s travel to all the capitals of the Subcontinent.

Despite the attempt to couch the initiative in South Asian terms, there is little doubt that Dr. Jaishankar’s visit to Pakistan is an important step forward by the Modi government. But it is important to note that Dr Jaishankar’s visit will be more in the nature of ‘talks about talks’.

As he reviews the state of bilateral relations with the Pakistani officials and political leadership, Dr. Jaishankar would want to test out the possibilities for instituting a new framework of engagement rather than simply return to status quo ante.

The significant change unfolding in the Subcontinent—both within the region and its international relations—demands that the two sides try and develop a fresh approach to the troubled relationship between India and Pakistan.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express. 

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicySouth AsiaPakistanIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good Reasons

    The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.

      Marc Pierini

  • Article
    Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of Connectivity

    The U.S.-sponsored TRIPP deal is driving the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process forward. But foreign and domestic hurdles remain before connectivity and economic interdependence can open up the South Caucasus.

      • Areg Kochinyan

      Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?

    Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Time to Merge the Commission and EEAS

    The EU is structurally incapable of reacting to today’s foreign policy crises. The union must fold the EEAS into the European Commission and create a security council better prepared to take action on the global stage.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic Opportunity

    The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.

      William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.