• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Andrei Kolesnikov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Inside Russia"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary

A Life of Resistance: Remembering Arseny Roginsky

Arseny Roginsky, founder of Memorial, was the embodiment of freedom. While Soviet authorities considered him to be anti-Soviet, he could best be described as, simply, not Soviet at all. Roginsky was a patriot of his country; his main goal being the protection of Russian history from the state’s attempts to obliterate its crimes.

Link Copied
By Andrei Kolesnikov
Published on Dec 28, 2017

Arseny Borisovich Roginsky passed away on the morning of December 18. Among his many distinctions, Roginsky managed to be a political prisoner, a defender of human rights, a historian, a philosopher, a disciple of the literary scholar Yury Lotman, and chief curator of the historical archives on Stalin’s repressions. In recent years, he was most prominently a founder and the head of the historical and civil rights society Memorial—and, by association, also labeled by the Russian government as a “foreign agent.”

At a conference last year, Roginsky noted, “Russian prisoners have a saying: ‘We don’t really care what the guards have to say about us here…’ but within the camp, there are only so many people. When the entire country labels you as a foreign agent, in other words a spy, it is a monstrous insult.”

Even within an impressive generation, Roginsky was incomparably honorable and charismatic. His entire life was spent resisting injustice. In the early 1980s, Roginsky was given the option to flee the country following accusations of his role in publishing anti-Soviet journals. Instead, he declined the offer and took on four more years of prison. During his trial, Roginsky delivered a closing statement titled “The Situation of a Historian in the Soviet Union,” which discussed the importance of historical archives in Russia. After serving his sentence in full, he was finally released in 1985. He spent the remainder of his life working on the archives of millions of Soviet citizens.

Among them, Roginsky found the case of my own grandfather. Together, we explored the details of my grandfather’s modest Soviet life as an architect and his death in 1946 in a labor camp—the same camp that Roginsky would find himself imprisoned at years later. Arseny Borisovich knew which archives to consult before even requesting them. This was just one example of how he fought against the state. He was always a few steps ahead of his opponents and enemies. Nevertheless, when necessary, he cooperated with the government. Earlier this year, Arseny Borisovich became a leading voice of support for the “Wall of Sorrow” monument in Moscow, dedicated to the victims of political repression. It was one of his final victories.

Today, the Russian state desperately struggles to achieve historical amnesia. The government wishes to obscure its shameful history and turn the highlights into postcards and comics. Roginsky belonged to a special category of people whom, in his own words, the authorities could always either “blame or forgive” for their actions. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the government took a short break from this strategy. Recently, it relaunched its attacks, but Roginsky continued resisting. 

With a pack of “Parliament Night Blue” cigarettes in the Memorial courtyard, Roginsky would often reflect on how to best defend his organization or preserve the “collective memory” of state repression. The dissident compilations that he was imprisoned for were entitled “Memory”—and Arseny Borisovich preserved these memories with relentless consistency, bit by bit, one human life at a time.  

Roginsky was a proponent of the “invisible hand” of the market—in this case, Stalin being an overbearing force that would define Russia’s trajectory for decades. His intimate understanding of Joseph Stalin—the man, the myth, and eventually the brand—spanned across Russia’s past and present. Roginsky would argue, “Take Stalin out of our lives and the thievery and disorder will disappear.” Some might say that his solution was a gross simplification. But maybe, after failed attempts to do this in the eras of Nikita Khrushchev and Mikhail Gorbachev, Russia should try again. If implemented correctly, perhaps Roginsky was indeed correct. 

While Soviet authorities considered Arseny Borisovich to be anti-Soviet, he could be best described as simply not Soviet at all. Roginsky was the embodiment of freedom. He was a patriot of his country. His main goal was the protection of Russian history from the state’s attempts to obliterate its crimes by any means necessary.  

Even in his late years, Arseny Borisovich’s chain-smoking and late-night coffee-drinking could be seen as principled preservations of personal liberties. During the 1980s, in solitary confinement, he smuggled a pack of “Prima” cigarettes, matches, and chifir (a concentrated tea often brewed in Russian prisons) through a hole in the wall. The government was not going to stop him from smoking.

About a month ago, from the apartment of his close friends Lena Nemirovskaya and Yury Senokosov, I spoke with Arseny Borisovich over the phone. Despite suffering from a serious illness, his voice had not changed. In his distinctive tone, his musings were ever more familiar—simultaneously ironic and serious. He expressed the desire to meet in Moscow. His parting words resembled a line from his speech at 1981 trial: “Please don’t worry about me. Soon we will write each other letters. And time will fly by…”

Indeed, my dear Arseny Borisovich, time flies by quite fast. 

This article originally appeared in Russian in Vedomosti.

About the Author

Andrei Kolesnikov

Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Kolesnikov was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    How the Putin Regime Subverted the Soviet Legacy

      Andrei Kolesnikov

  • Commentary
    Putin’s New Social Justice

      Andrei Kolesnikov

Andrei Kolesnikov
Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Andrei Kolesnikov
Economy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Article
    Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of Connectivity

    The U.S.-sponsored TRIPP deal is driving the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process forward. But foreign and domestic hurdles remain before connectivity and economic interdependence can open up the South Caucasus.

      • Areg Kochinyan

      Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev

  • Research
    Planetary vs International Security: Economic Growth at the Crossroads

    Economic growth is at the heart of a dilemma between planetary and international security.

      Olivia Lazard

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come Together

    The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How Europe Can Survive the AI Labor Transition

    Integrating AI into the workplace will increase job insecurity, fundamentally reshaping labor markets. To anticipate and manage this transition, the EU must build public trust, provide training infrastructures, and establish social protections.

      Amanda Coakley

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?

    EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.