• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Shruti Sharma"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia",
    "Technology and International Affairs"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Technology and Society"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Domestic Politics",
    "Technology"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie India

Combating Vaccine Hesitancy in India

Unless the government can up its communications game, anti-vax movements could prolong India’s pandemic effects.

Link Copied
By Shruti Sharma
Published on Apr 4, 2022
Project hero Image

Project

Technology and Society

This program focuses on five sets of imperatives: data, strategic technologies, emerging technologies, digital public infrastructure, and strategic partnerships.

Learn More

Vaccine hesitancy is not a new challenge in India. According to a survey released by the social network LocalCircles in October 2021, approximately 7.5 percent of adults in India were hesitant to take COVID-19 vaccines. Just one month later, the figure had grown to 12.3 percent.

According to some researchers and industry experts, vaccine hesitancy is likely to prolong the pandemic, leading to greater damage to the economy and threatening countries’ abilities to recover from the current shocks. Although the size of such anti-vax groups is still small worldwide, their online communication strategy is effective, in contrast to groups that explain the benefits of vaccines.

In India, there is a variety of possible reasons for growing vaccine hesitancy, which has become one of the contributing factors in India’s delayed target to fully vaccinate its entire adult population. For one, the Indian population may have developed a fear of side effects due to the limited availability of clinical trial data to prove the vaccines’ safety and efficacy.

For another, the concept of vaccination in India is limited to infants and children, unlike in Western countries. Since the COVID-19 immunization program is the first-ever adult vaccination program in the country, there weren’t many dedicated adult vaccination centers. And the awareness regarding adult vaccination was poor, especially in rural India.

Moreover, India’s voluntary immunization program allowed people to opt out of getting the shot. While citizens residing in urban areas had better access to information explaining the benefits of vaccines, myths started circulating in rural areas that vaccines could lead to death and illnesses in adults, contributing to vaccine hesitancy.

Other obstacles include linguistic barriers to access appropriate information, religious and ideological beliefs, difficulty reaching the vaccination centers, inequitable access to the health system, and mistrust in the system.

To instill vaccine confidence and build trust in the health system, the Indian government is expanding its communication strategies, especially through social media, to curb the spread of misinformation. It is also leveraging some of its existing initiatives, such as the Aspirational Districts Collaborative, to engage with local leaders to dispel misinformation around COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, some district-level administrations are urging people to take vaccines through awareness sessions or using regional folk songs to convey the benefits of vaccines. While these are baby steps in the right direction, it is important for India to develop a sustained campaign to tackle hesitancy.

The state governments in India should invest in evidence-based research to identify sections of the population with lower trust in vaccines and recognize causes of their hesitancy to expand immunization coverage. A team of multidisciplinary experts from behavioral science, biology, sociology, and other related fields should be formed at the state level to conduct rigorous research surrounding the psychological, social, religious, and political beliefs of a population regarding the administration of vaccines. Changes in the education curriculum to spread awareness about the benefits of vaccines could also help to build confidence.

Communicating the benefits of vaccines in local languages—corroborated with strong scientific evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy—is perhaps the most important for enhancing people’s trust and confidence in vaccines. In addition to leveraging social media platforms and public posters to dispel myths and promote vaccines, door-to-door campaigns in vaccine-hesitant areas might be crucial to address people’s concerns and instill or restore confidence in vaccines or their government before more hesitancy spreads to other regions.

In addition to effective vaccination campaigns, interventions are needed to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake among those who wish to take the vaccine but have difficulty accessing the vaccination centers. For example, the government could introduce financial remuneration or encourage private health insurance companies to include vaccines in a person’s coverage. Nonfinancial incentives, such as free food or a free health check-up, can also serve this end. While this strategy is already being used in a few countries like Israel, Serbia, and the United States, India can also experiment with this approach.  

Such sustained public engagement that anticipates people’s questions and addresses their concerns, combined with financial or nonfinancial incentives for vaccination, will be pivotal to address the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and strengthen India’s fight against this pandemic.

About the Author

Shruti Sharma

Former Associate Director, Fellow, and Chief Coordinator, Global Technology Summit, Technology and Society Program

Shruti Sharma was an associate director and a fellow with the Technology and Society Program at Carnegie India, where she is currently working on exploring the challenges and opportunities in leveraging biotechnology to improve public health capacity in India. Additionally, she is the Chief Coordinator of Carnegie India's Global Technology Summit.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    The India-United Kingdom Technology and Security Initiative: Ideas for Change
      • +1

      Rudra Chaudhuri, Tejas Bharadwaj, Konark Bhandari, …

  • Commentary
    The India-U.S. TRUST Initiative: A Resilient Pharma Supply Chain

      Shruti Sharma

Shruti Sharma
Former Associate Director, Fellow, and Chief Coordinator, Global Technology Summit, Technology and Society Program
Shruti Sharma
Domestic PoliticsTechnologySouth AsiaIndiaIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Turkey Erdogan Caucasus Central Asia
    Article
    How Turkey Can Help the Economies of the South Caucasus to Diversify

    Over the past two decades, regional collaboration in the South Caucasus has intensified. Turkey and the EU should establish a cooperation framework to accelerate economic development and diversification.

      • Feride Inan
      • Güven Sak
      • Berat Yücel

      Feride İnan, Güven Sak, Berat Yücel

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How Europe Can Survive the AI Labor Transition

    Integrating AI into the workplace will increase job insecurity, fundamentally reshaping labor markets. To anticipate and manage this transition, the EU must build public trust, provide training infrastructures, and establish social protections.

      Amanda Coakley

  • EU democracy support policies
    Paper
    European Democracy Support Annual Review 2025

    European democracy support strategy in 2025 prioritized protecting democratic norms within Europe. This signals the start of a structural recalibration of the EU’s approach to democracy support.

      • Elena-Viudes-Egea
      • +6

      Richard Youngs, ed., Elena Viudes Egea, Zselyke Csaky, …

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is It Time for Europe to Reengage With Belarus?

    In return for a trade deal and the release of political prisoners, the United States has lifted sanctions on Belarus, breaking the previous Western policy consensus. Should Europeans follow suit, using their leverage to extract concessions from Lukashenko, or continue to isolate a key Kremlin ally?

      Thomas de Waal, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.