Raluca Csernatoni, Sinan Ülgen
{
"authors": [
"Sinan Ülgen"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe"
],
"topics": [
"EU"
]
}Source: Getty
How Political Islamists View the Euro Crisis
Europe’s economic crisis is being used to carve out more fundamental divisions between Europe and its Muslim neighbors.
European leaders are focused on the economic costs of the euro crisis. At a time when their political survival depends on how soon an economic recovery will take place, and how strong it will be, this is surely understandable. But geo-economic realities should not conceal emerging geopolitical difficulties. The euro crisis is starting to fuel challenges to the European and, by extension, Western model. This is more easily observed from Europe’s Southern periphery, where the debate is less about the obscure financial or institutional panaceas advanced as the ultimate solution to the crisis, and more about the failings of the European model.
As result of the Arab spring, the EU’s crisis has overlapped with the emergence of a more pluralistic discussion about the proper model for Arab nations. Europe’s perceived fragility has undermined the effectiveness of the non-Islamist constituencies arguing for the establishment of a “European” model based on a diminished role for religion in the public sphere and stronger checks and balances. It has made it more difficult to build a stronger counter-narrative to political Islam at the very moment when political Islamists are being empowered.
Political Islamists now tend to view the West in general, and Europe in particular, as a civilization in political, economic, social, and moral decline. This perception is used as a justification to build a different social order that would be less secular and, it is argued, more just and more moral.
The West’s perceived decline also facilitates anti-Western discourse and the articulation of a socio-political vision that takes anti-Westernization as its point of reference. This civilizational divide is now apparent even in Turkey, the most secular country in the EU’s southern neighborhood.
Having now clearly decided that the path toward EU membership offers little hope, Turkey’s leadership seems intent on positioning the country as the lead nation of a different—real Islamic—civilization. Delivering the keynote speech at the Istanbul Forum two weeks ago, Ibrahim Kalin, lead advisor to Prime Minister Erdogan, clearly illustrated this change in posture by attributing Europe’s decline to over-secularization and rampant consumerism. He also contended that the new geopolitical order will be much less Euro-centric and alluded to Turkey’s role in becoming a pillar of this emerging multipolar world order.
Instead of bridging the divide between the north and the south of the Mediterranean, the EU seems almost helpless against a wave of Islamist thinkers that have used Europe’s economic crisis to underscore the differences between the “land of Islam” and Western civilization. If these tendencies continue unabated, the consequences will be dire for aspirations of a more harmonious relationship between Europe and its southern neighbors. Equally of concern should be the impact of this type of discourse on the Islamic communities within Europe. Europe’s economic crisis is therefore not limited to creating divisions within Europe but is also being used to carve out more fundamental divisions between Europe and its Muslim neighbors.
About the Author
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Sinan Ülgen is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, where his research focuses on Turkish foreign policy, transatlantic relations, international trade, economic security, and digital policy.
- Can the EU Achieve Its Tech Ambitions?Q&A
- Can the EU Overcome Divisions on Defense?Q&A
Catherine Hoeffler, Sinan Ülgen
Recent Work
More Work from Strategic Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?Commentary
French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not LessCommentary
Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.
Dimitar Bechev
- Europe on Iran: Gone with the WindCommentary
Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.
Pierre Vimont
- Taking the Pulse: Can European Defense Survive the Death of FCAS?Commentary
France and Germany’s failure to agree on the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) raises questions about European defense. Amid industrial rivalries and competing strategic cultures, what does the future of European military industrial projects look like?
Rym Momtaz, ed.