Commentary
Judy Dempsey
{
"authors": [
"Judy Dempsey"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Iraq"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Military",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Judy Asks: Has Hard Power Failed in Iraq?
Every week a selection of leading experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Jan 15, 2014
Every week a selection of leading experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.
John JudisSenior editor of the New Republic and author of Genesis: Truman, American Jews, and the Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict
If this question is asking whether the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq failed, that is certainly the case. The invasion led to the deaths of at least several hundred thousand Iraqis, the emigration of thousands more, many of whom were part of the country’s professional class, and the destruction of Iraq’s economy, which was already being crippled by sanctions.
The invasion also inspired the creation within Iraq of al-Qaeda, which had not been welcome under former president Saddam Hussein, and spurred the group’s recruitment elsewhere. It removed a balance of power within the region, and it did not create a democracy, but seems to have replaced an authoritarian Sunni state with a Shia one. The intervention may have set back women’s emancipation. It certainly weakened America’s credibility within the region, and the practice of torture and disregard for civilian lives sullied America’s reputation throughout the world. Last but not least, the invasion cost the U.S. thousands of lives and up to $1 trillion.
A more appropriate question might be whether there are any tiny ways in which hard power has succeeded in Iraq. I can’t think of any right now—but, to echo former U.S. president Dwight Eisenhower when asked about the ideas vice president Richard Nixon had contributed to his administration, give me a few weeks and I might think of one.
Gianni RiottaMember of the Council on Foreign Relations
Yes, U.S. hard power in Iraq has failed. The war begun by former president George W. Bush, the troop surge of 2007, President Barack Obama’s dreams of agreement among the country’s political rivals—all have been unsuccessful.
The government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is sputtering. It has been unable to broker a deal with the country’s Sunni community. Its international agenda is confusing, its oil production reforms are slow, and its approach to Syria is messy. Al-Qaeda’s black flags are flying over the city of Fallujah, but for how long? Al-Qaeda cannot rule Iraq; it can only stir the cauldron of suffering, pain, and strife.
Iraq today resembles a European country during the Middle Ages, or China during the Warlord Era of the early twentieth century: marked by chaos, confusion, and infighting. Paradoxically, only former president Saddam Hussein had the knack for imposing an iron fist on his fellow citizens.
About the Author
Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe
- Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying
- Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European PopulistsCommentary
Judy Dempsey
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Strategic Europe
- Europe Should Not Let Nuclear Nonproliferation DieCommentary
Amid uncertainty caused by the Iran war, the global drive for nonproliferation has stalled. With Europe diplomatically marginalized and countries reassessing their nuclear options, efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons risk becoming irrelevant.
Jane Darby Menton
- Trump Turns NATO into a Tool of CoercionCommentary
The full list of humiliations Europe has endured since Donald Trump returned to the White House makes for grim reading. But Washington’s adversarial approach to its allies undermines its own power base.
Rym Momtaz
- How the EU Can Become Energy IndependentCommentary
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has triggered a global energy crisis, but Europe is stuck in reaction mode. Without more strategic foresight, the EU will remain dependent on fossil fuels and will never be truly secure.
Milo McBride, Pauline Gerard
- Taking the Pulse: Is it Worth it for Europeans to Placate Trump?Commentary
After spending much of 2025 trying to placate Donald Trump, some European leaders are starting to change posture. But is even a hostile Washington still so important to Europe that the U.S. president’s outbursts are worth putting up with?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Europeans Are Quiet Quitting the United StatesCommentary
European leaders have now not only lost faith in Donald Trump’s U.S. presidency, but also in America’s hegemony as a whole. But short-term challenges make an immediate divorce unwise.
Rym Momtaz
