• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Paul Haenle",
    "Hoang Thi Ha"
  ],
  "type": "questionAnswer",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Carnegie China Commentaries"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}

Source: Getty

Q&A
Carnegie China

Positive-Sum Competition in Southeast Asia

Can Southeast Asian countries benefit from U.S.-China competition?

Link Copied
By Paul Haenle and Hoang Thi Ha
Published on Dec 23, 2022

On a recent episode of the China in the World podcast, Paul Haenle spoke with Hoang Thi Ha, Senior Fellow and the Co-coordinator of the Regional Strategic and Political Studies Programme at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, about China’s growing influence and diplomacy in Southeast Asia. A portion of their conversation, which has been edited and condensed for clarity, is below.

Paul Haenle: In a recent article for Think China, I was struck by something you wrote about how Southeast Asian countries stand to benefit from the competitive dynamic between the United States and China. This is not a view you hear often from officials in the region. Some worry that great power competition will have mostly negative externalities. So, help me understand your argument. Is it that the United States and China will compete to provide positive inducements to the region? How will this play out?

Hoang Thi Ha: There are certainly negative externalities for the region. We are all concerned about the fallout from U.S.-China strategic competition in terms of economic as well as security implications. But that should not prevent us from looking at the more positive side of the game. Great power competition is not only about prevailing over the other side in military terms but also about running faster and winning over more allies and partners. And that involves providing positive inducements. In the end, I think it boils down to this question: Between the United States and China, and their respective governance systems, which country will excel at delivering economic growth, political stability, and social mobility at home, while enabling solutions to global challenges and responding to the world’s development needs.

So positive inducements are not simply a matter of giving handouts or providing more aid; they are about being part of the success story of regional countries and enabling their development and economic growth through trade, investment, capacity building, and technology transfer. The United States did this exceptionally well during the Cold War with the Soviet Union. In this century, China stands a good chance of success as well.

We all know that Southeast Asia is economically and geopolitically attracted to both Washington and Beijing. And Southeast Asian countries have leveraged this U.S.-China competitive dynamic to their benefit. For example, Southeast Asia was a priority region for both the United States and China’s vaccine diplomacy and pandemic response in 2020. Recent statistics show that Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines are among the top 10 recipients of both American and Chinese vaccine donations. China’s vaccine sales accounted for almost 70 percent of Indonesia’s vaccine portfolio in 2021. In the case of Cambodia, it was almost 90 percent. This facilitated a timely vaccination program and early opening of Cambodia’s borders in 2021. China’s vaccine diplomacy was very much a success story regardless of the reservations about the lower efficacy rates of Chinese vaccines as compared to mRNA vaccines.

Another important development to watch is that both the United States and China are seeking to dovetail their development assistance and foreign policy goals with their domestic growth agenda. This domestic development agenda increasingly focuses on green development, clean technologies, climate solutions, and the digital economy, which will open up new opportunities for growing collaboration, investment, and capacity building with ASEAN countries going forward.

The United States also is stepping up collaboration with its allies and partners through the Quad and other ad hoc arrangements such as “Quad Plus” and “Quad Minus” to scale up their capabilities in offering regional public goods in areas such as Covid-19 vaccines, energy security, critical technologies, and supply chain resilience. Although these initiatives are shrouded in geopolitics and countering Chinese influence, this positive agenda will potentially steer U.S. competition with China in a more responsible and healthy manner rather than a purely militarized approach.

For more, listen to the full episode and subscribe to the China in the World podcast.

About the Authors

Paul Haenle

Former Maurice R. Greenberg Director’s Chair, Carnegie China

Paul Haenle held the Maurice R. Greenberg Director’s Chair at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and is a visiting senior research fellow at the East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore. He served as the White House China director on the National Security Council staffs of former presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Hoang Thi Ha

Senior Fellow, ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute

Hoang Thi Ha is senior fellow and co-coordinator of the Regional Strategic and Political Studies Programme at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.

Authors

Paul Haenle
Former Maurice R. Greenberg Director’s Chair, Carnegie China
Paul Haenle
Hoang Thi Ha
Senior Fellow, ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute
Hoang Thi Ha

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    ASEAN-China Digital Cooperation: Deeper but Clear-Eyed Engagement

    ASEAN needs to determine how to balance perpetuating the benefits of technology cooperation with China while mitigating the risks of getting caught in the crosshairs of U.S.-China gamesmanship.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    Today’s Rare Earths Conflict Echoes the 1973 Oil Crisis — But It’s Not the Same

    Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.

      Alvin Camba

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.