REQUIRED IMAGE
Source: Carnegie
Summary
In the 1990s the Brazilian government embarked on a new era, privatizing previously state-owned companies like the country's first large-scale steel mill, National Steel Company (CSN). Privatized enterprises like CSN have seen growing profits, have attracted more investment, and have contributed to Brazil's growth in the 1990s. However, privatization could have had even more benefits-broadening as well as increasing the benefits of more efficient and competitive firms. Here, Roberto Macedo analyzes how a program that could have increased access to-or democratize-capital ownership, ended up mostly benefiting big business in Brazil and abroad.
In selling its shares in state-owned enterprises, the Brazilian government, Macedo shows, opted for a higher price by auctioning large and controlling blocks of shares to national companies, foreign investors, pension funds, and financial institutions. Offerings to the public were minimal, and targeted offerings to employees of firms being privatized, for example, benefited high-wage workers.
Macedo argues that the privatization program contributed to the enlargement of Brazil's public debt and large fiscal deficits by delaying the devaluation of the Brazilian real-which took place only last year. Once again, the poorest groups are likely to lose out-since they will share the tax burden of payment on the increased public debt and will suffer the resulting higher interest rates. Other countries that plan to undertake privatization programs would be wise to ensure that benefits accrue to the whole of society, and not just to the wealthy.
Click on link above for full text of this Carnegie Paper.
R Mazedo
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
As geopolitical rivalry weaponizes global supply chains, the EU’s true vulnerability lies in emerging-risk imports. For these goods, suppliers are growing more concentrated, substitution more difficult, and political risk is looming.
Sinan Ülgen
It’s time to build momentum, and Ankara is the venue of the next opportune diplomatic window to do this.
Alper Coşkun, Garo Paylan
Strengthening U.S.-Africa trade and advancing U.S. interests aren’t conflicting goals.
Tyler Beckelman, Kholofelo Kugler
The U.S.-China Summit produced a welcome commitment to build a constructive, strategically stable relationship. However, the United States has a full agenda, including the USMCA review beginning this week, that will likely target Chinese practices of concern. If China views these efforts as inconsistent with the agreements reached in Beijing, it may slow or halt progress in response.
Barbara Weisel
Minsk’s faith in the future of its larger neighbor’s economy is fading as Belarusian firms in Russia see record losses.
Olga Loiko
