• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Batu Coşkun"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Sada",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Sada

Erdoğan Rediscovers Kemalism

Ahead of upcoming elections, Kemalism has made a surprising comeback in Turkey.

Link Copied
By Batu Coşkun
Published on Jan 12, 2023
Sada

Blog

Sada

Sada is an online journal rooted in Carnegie’s Middle East Program that seeks to foster and enrich debate about key political, economic, and social issues in the Arab world and provides a venue for new and established voices to deliver reflective analysis on these issues.

Learn More

In the early 2010s, Kemalism, the ideology named after modern Turkey’s founder and first president Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, had gone out of fashion. The country’s professedly foundational ideology appeared dated and blatantly illiberal, seeming to appeal only to a former political and economic elite desperate to cling to power under shifting circumstances. The ideology’s two pillars of militant secularism and forced westernization clashed deeply with Turkish society, harkening back to a tiresome chapter of recent political history that reeked of state violence. 

The post-Kemalist epoch in Turkey was thus well underway, bolstered by the political prowess of then-prime minister, now president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Erdoğan had been steadfast in dismantling the sacrosanct tenets of the Kemalist state, namely through reshaping civil-military relations by reducing the autonomy of the armed forces, reevaluating the Kurdish Question through a political process which stipulated negotiations with Kurdish insurgents, and most significantly, increasing the visibility of religious persons in the public sphere.  

Today, these trends have almost entirely reversed. Erdoğan has been rediscovering Kemalism since the failed coup attempt of 2016 which the government blamed on the exiled cleric Fethullah Gulen. This event forced Erdoğan into an alliance with supporters of the formerly shunned Kemalist ideology, and as he utilized his newfound coalition to purge the state of Gulenists, his politics shifted in accordance. State cadres that were emptied by the departure of Gulen’s followers were staffed with nationalists. Turkey’s security sector once again became the nexus of public life. On the Kurdish Question, Erdoğan reverted to the state’s original rationale that a military solution is the only appropriate response to attempts at separatism.  

However, the president is not only embracing Kemalism, but he is also defining the ideology’s current incarnation. Kemalism à la Erdoğan appeals to a larger segment of society than ever before—bridging Turkey’s nationalists and conservatives. In a country where the center of politics leans unequivocally to the right, these sentiments have natural constituents. 

Yet, one clear demarcation between Erdoğan and the Kemalists remains the visibility of religion in the public sphere. Both Erdoğan and his new allies have allowed for pragmatism to prevail in this regard. Despite the republican old guard’s overwhelming disdain for the pious masses, an overarching and almost universally acclaimed nationalism reigns supreme in Turkey. Early republican icons are merged with religious undertones in a blend that evokes the classic Kemalist sentiments of anti-colonialism, distrust of Western powers, and an autarkist model of economic advancement. Erdoğan’s Kemalism is indeed more inclusive, as it re-interprets the ideology to appeal to Turkey’s large conservative populace. In its current iteration, Kemalist ambitions of transforming society are put aside, and the ideology’s maxim of deference to state authority is emphasized. 

This consensus was on full display in Erdoğan’s recently unveiled grand electoral manifesto “Century of Turkey.” Erdoğan’s electoral program took inspiration from the formative years of republican Turkey, drawing parallels between the struggles of the early Turkish nation state and his current endeavors— a particularly apt comparison as the centenary of the republic approaches. In his bid to shape the ideology, Erdoğan combines the natural Kemalist urge for militarism with Turkey’s burgeoning defense industry, which has grown under the direct auspices his family. 

For Erdoğan, the Kemalist alliance has been advantageous on two fronts. First and foremost, he has discovered new constituencies in the political center and right significant enough to fill the void left by the departure of Kurdish voters and liberally inclined city dwellers. Second, Erdoğan now commands the entire extent of the Kemalist state apparatus, including the increasingly significant security institutions, which has allowed him to utilize the state’s coercive mechanisms at will. Whether or not this alliance will prevail will be tested in June 2023, when Turkey heads to one of its most significant elections in recent memory. 

Batu Coşkun is a political risk analyst on Turkish affairs and a research fellow at the Sadeq Institute. He tweets at @BatuCoskunn. 

Batu Coşkun

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Sada

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Sub-Saharan African Migrants in Morocco: Security Concerns and the Test of Human Rights

    Is Morocco’s migration policy protecting Sub-Saharan African migrants or managing them for political and security ends? This article unpacks the gaps, the risks, and the paths toward real rights-based integration.

      Soufiane Elgoumri

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign Policy

    Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.

      Mike Fleet

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Role of E-commerce in Empowering Women in Saudi Arabia: Assessing the Policy Potential

    How can Saudi Arabia turn its booming e-commerce sector into a real engine of economic empowerment for women amid persistent gaps in capital access, digital training, and workplace inclusion? This piece explores the policy fixes, from data-center integration to gender-responsive regulation, that could unlock women’s full potential in the kingdom’s digital economy.

      Hannan Hussain

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A War Fueled by Hate Speech: Sudan’s Fall into Fragmentation

    Hate speech has spread across Sudan and become a key factor in worsening the war between the army and the Rapid Support Forces. The article provides expert analysis and historical background to show how hateful rhetoric has fueled violence, justified atrocities, and weakened national unity, while also suggesting ways to counter it through justice, education, and promoting a culture of peace.

      Samar Sulaiman

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Disarming Palestinian Factions in Lebanon: Can a Security Experiment Evolve into Sovereign Policy?

    The August 2025 government decision to restrict weapons to the Lebanese state, starting with Palestinian arms in the camps, marked a major test of Lebanon’s ability to turn a long-standing slogan into practical policy. Yet the experiment quickly exposed political hesitation, social gaps, and factional divisions, raising the question of whether it can become a model for addressing more sensitive files such as Hezbollah’s weapons.

      Souhayb Jawhar

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.