• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Pierre Boussel"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Sada",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Sada

The Turkish Elections and Syria’s Future

The upcoming Turkish presidential election will have serious but uncertain consequences for the security and humanitarian situation in northwestern Syria.

Link Copied
By Pierre Boussel
Published on Feb 16, 2023
Sada

Blog

Sada

Sada is an online journal rooted in Carnegie’s Middle East Program that seeks to foster and enrich debate about key political, economic, and social issues in the Arab world and provides a venue for new and established voices to deliver reflective analysis on these issues.

Learn More
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

In early Febreuary, the Syrian-Turkish border area once again became the center of international news following the deaths of thousands as a result of a massive earthquake that struck southern Turkey. The political complexities of the area came to the fore against the backdrop of difficult attempts to coordinate humanitarian aid and rescue efforts. Yet, the humanitarian and security situation in the area has been fragile for years. 

President Erdogan has always made Syria a priority, because it represents both the first circle of his strategic depth and a possible infiltration zone for Kurdish independence fighters. With some polls predicting that the ubiquitous and immovable Erdogan will lose the presidential election to be held on May 14, concern is growing over two key campaign issues: Erdogan’s call for reconciliation with Damascus and the departure of approximately 3.6 million Syrian refugees. Indeed, Erdogan is currently under threat from a coalition of opposition parties, among them the Kemalist CHP—the Republican People's Party—which is demanding a review of Turkish policy in Syria. Pressed also by his own AKP electoral base, Erdogan has made commitments on these two issues, even if he is hardly in favor of either. 

In this context, a program for the return of Syrians is planned, which would see about one million refugees repatriated to northern Syria. Turkish dialogue with Damascus has also been initiatied under the auspices of Russia despite deep antagonism between the two neighbors regarding Turkish activities in the northwest.  

In northwestern Syria, the population has mobilized to express hostility towards Turkey’s new policy of dialogue with the Assad government. The group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), although a Turkish ally, regrets that the Turkish agenda “does not coincide” with the objectives of the Syrian revolution. A coalition of armed groups united under the banner of the Syrian National Army (SNA) also opposes Turkish normalization with the Syrian regime, which they fear could lead to fratricidal fighting between armed groups in the event of a hasty Turkish withdrawal. 

A victory for Erdogan would probably mean a continuation of his current policy in Syria, but in the case of his loss, it is likely that the new presidential team will seek to embody change. Few changes are expected on the anti-PKK struggle, but many questions revolve around Syria. For example, the Turkish army is currently building a helipad at the Baluon base to reinforce its 60 to 80 military posts in Idlib province. If there is a change of government in Ankara, it is not clear whether these posts will be dismantled or reinforced. 

Alliances also matter. Armed groups in Idlib province maintain regular contact with Turkish intelligence. They are used to living with the specter of a large-scale military operation against the Syrian Defense Forces (SDF), an option opposed by the Americans and the Russians. It remains uncertain how a possible Turkish rapprochement with Damascus would impact Turkish calculations on the ground. For now, HTS leaders talk about a “wrong path” and reassure themselves that reconciliation is unlikely because of Syrian-Turkish differences related to territorial interference and the role of the PKK. 

Displaced people residing in the northwest continue to search for means of survival against a backdrop of intense political uncertainty and acute humanitarian suffering. Syrian refugees in Turkey have also been concerened by Erdogan’s announcement that repatriation efforts will be accelerated as soon as diplomatic initiatives with the Syrian regime produce results.  

For years, the situation in northwest Syria has been highly dependent on decisions coming out of Ankara. This remains true now, as refugees, displaced people, and armed groups await the results of the Turkish elections. They know that their futures will be affected by the vote, regardless of the outcome. 

Pierre Boussel is a columnist and an associate researcher at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS-Paris). His work focuses on armed groups in the Arab world and political Islam.

Pierre Boussel

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Sada

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Sub-Saharan African Migrants in Morocco: Security Concerns and the Test of Human Rights

    Is Morocco’s migration policy protecting Sub-Saharan African migrants or managing them for political and security ends? This article unpacks the gaps, the risks, and the paths toward real rights-based integration.

      Soufiane Elgoumri

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign Policy

    Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.

      Mike Fleet

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Role of E-commerce in Empowering Women in Saudi Arabia: Assessing the Policy Potential

    How can Saudi Arabia turn its booming e-commerce sector into a real engine of economic empowerment for women amid persistent gaps in capital access, digital training, and workplace inclusion? This piece explores the policy fixes, from data-center integration to gender-responsive regulation, that could unlock women’s full potential in the kingdom’s digital economy.

      Hannan Hussain

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A War Fueled by Hate Speech: Sudan’s Fall into Fragmentation

    Hate speech has spread across Sudan and become a key factor in worsening the war between the army and the Rapid Support Forces. The article provides expert analysis and historical background to show how hateful rhetoric has fueled violence, justified atrocities, and weakened national unity, while also suggesting ways to counter it through justice, education, and promoting a culture of peace.

      Samar Sulaiman

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Disarming Palestinian Factions in Lebanon: Can a Security Experiment Evolve into Sovereign Policy?

    The August 2025 government decision to restrict weapons to the Lebanese state, starting with Palestinian arms in the camps, marked a major test of Lebanon’s ability to turn a long-standing slogan into practical policy. Yet the experiment quickly exposed political hesitation, social gaps, and factional divisions, raising the question of whether it can become a model for addressing more sensitive files such as Hezbollah’s weapons.

      Souhayb Jawhar

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.