• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Maged Mandour"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Sada",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Sada

Budget Breakdown: Addressing Egypt’s Debt Crisis

Consolidating public resources is an obvious step to help alleviate Egypt’s growing debt burden, but one that Sisi’s regime avoids at all costs.

Link Copied
By Maged Mandour
Published on Sep 21, 2023
Sada

Blog

Sada

Sada is an online journal rooted in Carnegie’s Middle East Program that seeks to foster and enrich debate about key political, economic, and social issues in the Arab world and provides a venue for new and established voices to deliver reflective analysis on these issues.

Learn More
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

On July 31, Egyptian Minister of Finance Mohamed Maati announced that the debt-to-GDP ratio was expected to reach 97 percent during the summer, a whopping 16.8 percent increase from June 2022. Egypt’s external financing needs for the current and coming fiscal year will be at least $41.5 billion—excluding $14 billion owed to its Gulf allies, which is expected to be rolled over. These are clear signs of Egypt`s deepening debt crisis, with a desperate need for sources of financing. 

One would expect President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi’s regime to consolidate all available public resources. However, a cursory examination reveals three different sources of public funds that are not fully integrated into the state budget: the economic authorities, the special slush funds, and the military owned enterprises.

There are 59 state-owned economic authorities operating across 12 sectors, from construction to tourism, with independent budgets that, in total, equal the entire state budget. In theory, surplus funding from the authorities could be transferred to the state budget, but they have operated at a loss in recent years—169.7 billion EGP in the current fiscal year, increasing from 86.3 billion EGP in 2018—and rely on the state budget to fill in the gap. While transfers from the state budget to the authorities must be approved by the parliament, the latter only receives an aggregate figure of the authorities’ budgets, limiting their supervisory power to review planned expenditures. Moreover, economic authorities can take out state-backed loans, estimated to reach 251 billion EGP this fiscal year, which do not appear in the state budget.

Special slush funds are directly managed by government agencies and ministries, including the ministry of defense and the interior. Although the funds were originally intended to lighten the state budget’s burden and provide flexibility to the ministries, in reality, they are operated as independent fiefdoms. No oversight mechanism was ever introduced, and the number and value of these funds remain obscure; according to the best available estimates from 2014, they total $9.4 billion, which could go a long way to alleviate the debt crisis. 

Finally, there are the tax-exempt military owned enterprises, whose finances also remain concealed. Based on a statement by Sisi in 2016, the military accounts for 1.5 to 2 percent of the Egyptian economy ($2.39 billion to $4.46 billion). The growing military footprint and its control over economic policy has been a hallmark of Sisi’s government and one of the roots of the current debt crisis. Indeed, one of the main conditions of last year’s $3 billion IMF loan is to reform the governance structure of these entities, end their tax exemptions, and level the playing field for the private sector.

This fragmented landscape allows the regime and its allies in the state bureaucracy to appropriate public funds and obscure graft, while weakening the parliament’s ability to monitor public expenditure. The economic authorities and the military, for example, play a key role in the Sisi's quest to build the New Administrative Capital. With an estimated budget of $58 billion, this megaproject is being developed by the Administrative Capital Urban Development Company—co-owned by the Ministry of Defense and the New Urban Community Authority, an economic authority controlled by the Ministry of Housing. This ownership structure has allowed government officials to proclaim that the project is independent of the state budget, even though it uses public funds. This structure has also enabled the Sisi's government to use subsidized state-bank loans and debt to finance the project, all with no parliamentary oversight and without appearing in the state budget. 

Although aggregating state resources could help the government address the deepening crisis, doing so would increase the power of parliament and weaken the ability of the regime and its allies to appropriate public funds. A fragmented and opaque budgetary landscape may help ensure the stability of the ruling coalition and the regime’s survival, but it will come at the price of Egypt’s short and long-term financial health. 

Maged Mandour is a political analyst who is a regular contributor to the Arab Digest, Middle East Eye, and Open Democracy and author of an upcoming book entitled “Egypt Under Sisi.

Maged Mandour

Maged Mandour is a political analyst who is a regular contributor to the Arab Digest, Middle East Eye, and Open Democracy and author of an upcoming book entitled “Egypt Under Sisi.”

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Sada

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Sub-Saharan African Migrants in Morocco: Security Concerns and the Test of Human Rights

    Is Morocco’s migration policy protecting Sub-Saharan African migrants or managing them for political and security ends? This article unpacks the gaps, the risks, and the paths toward real rights-based integration.

      Soufiane Elgoumri

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign Policy

    Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.

      Mike Fleet

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Role of E-commerce in Empowering Women in Saudi Arabia: Assessing the Policy Potential

    How can Saudi Arabia turn its booming e-commerce sector into a real engine of economic empowerment for women amid persistent gaps in capital access, digital training, and workplace inclusion? This piece explores the policy fixes, from data-center integration to gender-responsive regulation, that could unlock women’s full potential in the kingdom’s digital economy.

      Hannan Hussain

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A War Fueled by Hate Speech: Sudan’s Fall into Fragmentation

    Hate speech has spread across Sudan and become a key factor in worsening the war between the army and the Rapid Support Forces. The article provides expert analysis and historical background to show how hateful rhetoric has fueled violence, justified atrocities, and weakened national unity, while also suggesting ways to counter it through justice, education, and promoting a culture of peace.

      Samar Sulaiman

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Disarming Palestinian Factions in Lebanon: Can a Security Experiment Evolve into Sovereign Policy?

    The August 2025 government decision to restrict weapons to the Lebanese state, starting with Palestinian arms in the camps, marked a major test of Lebanon’s ability to turn a long-standing slogan into practical policy. Yet the experiment quickly exposed political hesitation, social gaps, and factional divisions, raising the question of whether it can become a model for addressing more sensitive files such as Hezbollah’s weapons.

      Souhayb Jawhar

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.