Five Policy Uses of Algorithmic Explainability

{
  "authors": [
    "Matt O'Shaughnessy"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "TIA",
  "programs": [
    "Technology and International Affairs"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Technology"
  ]
}

In The Media

Five Policy Uses of Algorithmic Explainability

The notion that algorithmic systems should be "explainable" is common in the many statements of consensus principles developed by governments, companies, and advocacy organizations.

By Matt O'Shaughnessy

Published on Feb 6, 2023

arxiv.org

About the Author

Matt O'Shaughnessy

Former Visiting Fellow, Technology and International Affairs Program

Matt O’Shaughnessy was a visiting fellow in the Technology and International Affairs Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he applies his technical background in machine learning to research on the geopolitics and global governance of technology.

Recent Work

Commentary
How Hype Over AI Superintelligence Could Lead Policy Astray
- Matt O'Shaughnessy
Commentary
What a Chinese Regulation Proposal Reveals About AI and Democratic Values
- Matt O'Shaughnessy

Technology Iran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Emissary
Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.
The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.
Jeffrey Prescott
Paper
AI Breakout Capacity: A Middle-Power Path Between Racing and Dependence
Germany, India, and other middle powers can’t build frontier AI alone, and they risk being cut off if they depend on the United States or China. The way through is to build the capacity for a frontier sprint while hoping never to use it.
Anton Leicht, Sam Winter-Levy
Research
The Disruptive Politics of AI
AI technology has proliferated extensively and offers authoritarian leaders three crucial advantages: scale, speed, and efficiency. As a result, it has undoubtedly become a crucial tool of repression. But AI tools also give individuals and activists the means to organize, resist, and hold their governments accountable. Today, it is far more difficult for autocratic leaders to hide their corrupt practices and govern in darkness.
Steve Feldstein, Shreya Joshi
Commentary
Diwan
Three Ruptures and the End of Pax Americana in the Middle East
As the U.S. stumbles in its war with Iran, we are likely to see an acceleration of its disengagement from the region.
Michael Young
Commentary
Emissary
Who Gets to Put Guardrails on AI?
Why governance of rapidly evolving technology will be distributed and complex.
Stewart Patrick, Scott Singer

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Trump holding a glass of champagne up in a toast, with a table of guests in the foreground

Commentary

Emissary

Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.

The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.

Jeffrey Prescott

Two men sit on red chairs in front of a window with a NYC city skyline.

Paper

AI Breakout Capacity: A Middle-Power Path Between Racing and Dependence

Germany, India, and other middle powers can’t build frontier AI alone, and they risk being cut off if they depend on the United States or China. The way through is to build the capacity for a frontier sprint while hoping never to use it.

Anton Leicht, Sam Winter-Levy

Research

The Disruptive Politics of AI

AI technology has proliferated extensively and offers authoritarian leaders three crucial advantages: scale, speed, and efficiency. As a result, it has undoubtedly become a crucial tool of repression. But AI tools also give individuals and activists the means to organize, resist, and hold their governments accountable. Today, it is far more difficult for autocratic leaders to hide their corrupt practices and govern in darkness.

Steve Feldstein, Shreya Joshi

Commentary

Diwan

Three Ruptures and the End of Pax Americana in the Middle East

As the U.S. stumbles in its war with Iran, we are likely to see an acceleration of its disengagement from the region.

Michael Young

Commentary

Emissary

Who Gets to Put Guardrails on AI?

Why governance of rapidly evolving technology will be distributed and complex.

Stewart Patrick, Scott Singer