• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Husain Haqqani"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy",
    "Economy",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

In The Media

Muslims: Scant Cause for Respect

Link Copied
By Mr. Husain Haqqani
Published on Dec 20, 2002

Source: Carnegie

Originally published in the International Herald Tribune, December 20, 2002

Muslim rulers have built strategic partnerships with the decision-makers in the U.S. foreign policy establishment, just as Washington has backed these mostly authoritarian regimes in return for affordable oil or military cooperation. But there has been little effort by either side to base relations on the substantive foundation of issues that their people care about.

The unfavorable image of America in Arab and Muslim countries has been highlighted by several studies, notably the recent opinion survey by the Pew Research Center in association with the International Herald Tribune. A survey of American public opinion on foreign policy, published by the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, showed that while the importance of key Islamic countries is recognized across the United States, Muslim states are not looked upon favorably.

For example, 61 percent of Americans consider Saudi Arabia an unreliable partner in the war against terrorism. The Chicago council developed a public opinion thermometer to gauge the degree of warmth that Americans feel toward various countries. Pakistan scored 31 and Saudi Arabia 33, compared with 76 for Britain, 60 for Japan and Mexico, 55 for Israel and 46 for India.

Just as public opinion surveys in the Muslim world point to the lack of support in the streets for U.S. policies, this survey showed that leading Muslim states attract little enthusiasm and sympathy in Middle America.

For genuine friendship, the United States must understand why Muslims resent its power, and Muslims must figure out why they cannot win America's trust and respect. America needs to modify its foreign policy. The Muslim countries have to change the way they run things at home.

Muslim ideologues and U.S. neoconservatives alike would argue that the Muslim world and the West led by America are on a collision course. But according to the Chicago survey, only 27 percent of Americans think that a clash between Muslims and the West is inevitable. An encouraging 66 percent believe that common ground can be found and that the clash of civilizations can be avoided.

Middle America does not want the United States to take sides between Israel and the Palestinians. This weakens the argument of Muslim hard-liners that it is fair to hate America because of its support for Israel.

An overwhelming 71 percent of the respondents in the survey said the United States should not take sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, against 25 percent who said that it should take Israel's side. Only 1 percent wanted Washington to back the Palestinians.

Western civilization admires achievement and creativity. Muslims have fared poorly in both spheres since their encounter with Western ascendancy. The 56 member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference account for one-fifth of the world's population but their combined GDP is less than that of France.

The 22 Arab countries, including the oil-exporting Gulf states, account for a combined GDP less than Spain's.

Almost 60 percent of the world's Muslim population are illiterate. Muslims are noticeably absent from the list of recent inventors or innovators in science and technology.

Muslim output in literature is abysmally low. The arts remain marginalized in most Muslim states. While ideas direct the course of power in the West, those in power control the flow of ideas in the Muslim world.

An example of the difference between the Muslim and Western worlds is the way each approaches religious controversy. Rabbis and priests write books and produce television shows to make their point, while Muslims riot in the streets or attack their opponent physically when faced with a perceived insult to their religion. As a result, the Muslim world is seen by the West as oil-rich but ideas-poor and certainly unworthy of admiration or respect.

Islam's external enemies are the focus of most discourse in the Muslim world. Muslims have definitely suffered a setback from colonial rule. The injustice meted out to Palestinians, Chechens and Kashmiris under non-Muslim occupation is a real issue that needs to be tackled.

But the failure of Muslim societies to educate themselves, expand their economies and innovate cannot be attributed solely to the colonial experience or unresolved postcolonial disputes.

About the Author

Mr. Husain Haqqani

Former Visiting Scholar

    Recent Work

  • Report
    India and Pakistan: Is Peace Real This Time?: A Conversation between Husain Haqqani and Ashley J. Tellis

      Mr. Husain Haqqani, Ashley J. Tellis

  • Other
    America's New Alliance with Pakistan: Avoiding the Traps of the Past

      Mr. Husain Haqqani

Mr. Husain Haqqani
Former Visiting Scholar
Husain Haqqani
Political ReformDemocracyEconomySecurityForeign PolicySouth Asia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Fog of AI War

    In Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran, AI warfare has come to dominate, with barely any oversight or accountability. Europe must lead the charge on the responsible use of new military technologies.

      Raluca Csernatoni

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How to Join the EU in Three Easy Steps

    Montenegro and Albania are frontrunners for EU enlargement in the Western Balkans, but they can’t just sit back and wait. To meet their 2030 accession ambitions, they must make a strong positive case.

      Dimitar Bechev, Iliriana Gjoni

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?

    Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing It

    Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good Reasons

    The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.

      Marc Pierini

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.