• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUDemocracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Rachel Chan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Taiwan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

In The Media

Continuity in Store for Future U.S.-Taiwan-China Relations: Paal

The triangular relationship between the United States, Taiwan, and China is likely to continue on a stable trajectory as all sides try to avoid unnecessary friction and emphasize cooperation.

Link Copied
By Rachel Chan
Published on Oct 16, 2009

Source: Central News Agency

Continuity in Store for Future U.S.-Taiwan-China RDouglas Paal, former director of the American Institute in Taiwan, said Friday in Taipei that "continuity" will characterize prospects for the short-term strategic paths of the United States, Taiwan and China.

The proposition was reinforced by last year's election of a Taiwan administration that seeks to eschew unnecessary friction with China and seek areas of cooperation with Beijing, according to Paal.

He said Taiwan has at least two and a half years to seek success with its approach, and Beijing still appears willing to cooperate, though always with a wary eye to the downside risks.

Paal, who is now vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said at the seminar titled Taipei- Washington-Beijing Relations under the Ma and Obama Administrations" that both China and the U.S. are also likely to continue their current tactics.

He said China's direction, economically and otherwise, appears to enjoy what passes for a consensus on the mainland, while the U.S., under the new Obama administration, is actively seeking to accentuate the positive with Beijing.

Obama has identified the financial crisis, climate change, and non-proliferation as his key themes and has been seeking and initially obtaining Chinese cooperation in these areas, he added.

Paal also argued that Obama would undoubtedly like to see Taiwan shoulder an appropriate share of the burden of its own necessary defense.

"Indications are that his (Obama's) administration will assess Taiwan's requests with an eye to the actual situation rather than just the statements of China's leaders," Paal said.

"The friction that could result should be manageable within the broader positive context in U.S.-China relations, and in Taiwan's own efforts to avoid clumsily treading on sensitivities and to seek common interests," he added.

In the long term, Paal said whether the U.S., Taiwan, and China will change their strategic courses will depend on three factors that include the ability of the Ma Ying-jeou administration to demonstrate to Taiwan's voters that his policies are worth continuing.

The other two factors are China's avoidance of a domestic crisis, driven by factors such as a financial collapse, a failure to stimulate domestic consumption, or an embarrassing international setback; and America's readjustment of its economic trajectory from a capital importing to a capital exporting country, the downsizing of its international exposure to conflict, and fiscal responsibility, he added.

"These are significant threats, if now remote, to the positive sum game the triangular relationship has entered. The emergence of a significant change in any one of them will have a negative impact on the other two," Paal said.

About the Author

Rachel Chan

Rachel Chan
Foreign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChinaTaiwan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Letter from the Editor: Europe Takes Two Steps Forward But One Step Back

    As we close out another season of Strategic Europe, it is worth taking stock of the deep shifts underway.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Paper
    Assessing Information Ecosystems: How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats

    The hybrid warfare landscape is evolving rapidly, leaving policymakers without clear strategies. To better inform their work in addressing emerging challenges, governments must dig deeper into the underlying dynamics at play.

      Raluca Csernatoni, Alicia Wanless

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Are the EU’s Watered-Down Russia Sanctions Better than None?

    The EU had to compromise to adopt a twenty-first sanctions package against Russia, exposing growing cracks in the union’s resolve. Is this latest, weaker round worth it to keep pressure on Moscow?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Europe Must Take Charge of its Russia Diplomacy Now

    Trump is distracted and Ukraine wants Europe to step up. The continent’s leaders must find their voice and assert it in talks with Russia.

      Alissa de Carbonnel

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against Europe

    Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.

      Maksym Beznosiuk

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.