Commentary
Alexey Malashenko
{
"authors": [
"Alexey Malashenko"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [
"Eurasia in Transition"
],
"regions": [
"Gulf",
"Levant"
],
"topics": []
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Iran’s Ongoing Efforts to Gain a Foothold in the Middle East
President Ahmadinejad’s meeting with the leader of Hezbollah is further evidence of Iran’s efforts to gain a foothold in the Middle East as one of the key regional players.
Published on Oct 12, 2010
Source: The Valdai Discussion Club
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad plans to meet with Hassan Nasrallah, Secretary General of Hezbollah, one of the two major political parties in Lebanon representing Shiite Muslims. Do you believe this move will aggravate even further Iran’s tense relations with the United States and Israel?
Ahmadinejad’s meeting with the leader of Hezbollah will not aggravate the situation, it will simply provide yet more evidence of Iran’s ongoing efforts to gain a foothold in the Middle East as one of the key regional players. He is most likely to promise Hezbollah additional support, including financial and military assistance. However, Ahmadinejad will have to bear in mind that Hezbollah is a highly influential and legitimate political force in Lebanon, and as such would surely be reluctant to take any extreme steps, something Iran often tries to goad it into. There are differences between Nasrallah and Ahmadinejad, although they are unlikely to be highlighted during this meeting.
What about Iran’s role, as a regional power, in mediating the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – how much of an influence can Iran have on the process of building an independent Palestinian state? Can a peaceful settlement be reached without Iran’s participation in the talks?
Iran’s role in building a sovereign Palestinian state should not be overstated. Quite the reverse, in fact: should such a state be established, Iran’s influence would weaken. For Iran’s leadership it is the ongoing conflict that matters, the active involvement of radical Islamists. Iran looks more impressive and dramatic in confrontation than in détente.
How would you assess the changes in Russia’s foreign-policy paradigm regarding Iran?
Russia’s attitude toward Iran has changed, it has moved closer to that of the United States and Europe. The most eloquent example of this was Moscow’s backtracking on plans to sell Iran its S-300 air defense missile systems, which annoyed the Iranian leadership. Russia’s attempts to mediate in talks with Iran and prove that it is in a position to exert pressure on Ahmadinejad were unsuccessful.
Yet, officials in Moscow still cherish hopes for a restoration of “special relationship” with Iran – for another chance to prove that they can, in fact, pressure Iran into some concessions.
This interview originally appeared on the Valdai Discussion Club site.
About the Author
Alexey Malashenko
Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program
Malashenko is a former chair of the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Religion, Society, and Security Program.
- What Will Uzbekistan’s New President Do?
- Preserving the Calm in Russia’s Muslim CommunityCommentary
Alexey Malashenko
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Is it NATO’s Job to Support Trump’s War of Choice?Commentary
Donald Trump has demanded that European allies send ships to the Strait of Hormuz while his war of choice in Iran rages on. He has constantly berated NATO while the alliance’s secretary-general has emphatically supported him.
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come TogetherCommentary
The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.
Rym Momtaz
- Europe on Iran: Gone with the WindCommentary
Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.
Pierre Vimont
- Can Europe Still Matter in Syria?Commentary
Europe’s interests in Syria extend beyond migration management, yet the EU trails behind other players in the country’s post-Assad reconstruction. To boost its influence in Damascus, the union must upgrade its commitment to ensuring regional stability.
Bianka Speidl, Hanga Horváth-Sántha
- EU-Iran: Time to Revisit Assumptions and StrategizeCommentary
For too long, the EU focused on Iran’s nuclear program while mostly ignoring its malign regional activities and missile program. As the consequences of both hit closer to home, the union must pursue a new strategy focused on containing Iran’s regime, supporting Iranian civil society, and engaging with Gulf states.
Cornelius Adebahr
