Paper
James M. Acton, Ankit Panda
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China’s Foreign Relations",
"U.S. Nuclear Policy",
"Korean Peninsula"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"East Asia",
"South Korea",
"North Korea"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Security",
"Arms Control"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Will North Korea Strike?
North Korea has issued new threats against South Korea and has demanded an apology for protests in the South.
Published on Apr 16, 2013
Source: CTV News
North Korea has issued new threats against South Korea and has demanded an apology for recent protests in the South. Carnegie's James Acton spoke to CTV News about the latest developments.
"Anytime one country threatens another country with the use of nuclear weapons, which North Korea has done, you have to take those threats seriously," Acton pointed out, adding, "that said, do not think that North Korea or Kim Jong-un is about to wake up tomorrow morning and use a nuclear weapon against the United States."
Acton said that he is more worried about an accident, even at sea, that escalates into the use of nuclear weapons. "I think that there are a number of factors going on here," said Acton, "the first point to make is that the truth is that we don't know what is going on inside North Korea, it is widely regarded as being one of the toughest intelligence targets in the world."
"That said," Acton added, "some of what is going on in North Korea is presumably about the young, inexperienced leader, Kim Jong-un, asserting himself amongst his miiltary and perhaps his own population."
On China's position, Acton said that nothing new has come out of Secretary Kerry's visit to China. "If there is a shift in Chinese policy, I wouldn't expect to see much publicly, in general I would expect China to do its diplomacy quietly, behind the scenes," concluded Acton.
About the Author
James M. Acton
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Nuclear Weapons and the Future of American Power
- The Latest Iran Deal Ignores the Lessons of the PastCommentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- The EU’s Middle-Power PuzzleCommentary
While the EU and European governments are embracing the much-lauded middle-power moment, this entails three difficult conundrums.
Richard Youngs
- The Scramble for Europe. Russia, China, and Turkey Challenging Regional OrderBook
Europe is facing rising populism internally as well as external pressures from Russia, China, Turkey, and the United States.
Dimitar Bechev
- Separable, not Separate: Governing Europe’s Collective DefenseArticle
European NATO countries are wrestling with the possibility of U.S. disengagement from the alliance. With the continent’s security increasingly uncertain, governments must restore the credibility of their collective defense.
Hans-Dieter Lucas, Adam Thomson, Pierre Vimont
- The Denmark-Greenland-U.S. Agreement Needs to Stand the Test of TimeCommentary
The new U.S.–Denmark–Greenland agreement will help Washington exert political, economic, and financial dominance under the guise of security. Yet, it acknowledged Copenhagen’s and Nuuk’s sovereignty on the island.
Marc Pierini
- A Black Sea Truce Is About Global Food Security, TooCommentary
A summer of escalation in the Black Sea has hurt Ukraine economically and is exacerbating world food security. A truce is needed—as is a broader reframing of Europe’s Ukraine strategy.
Thomas de Waal
