• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China",
    "Carnegie India",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "China’s Foreign Relations"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "South Korea",
    "China",
    "Japan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Arms Control"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Beyond Vikrant

As India celebrates the launch of the Vikrant, the much delayed first indigenous aircraft carrier, Delhi is not the only one in Asia focused on the virtues of airpower at sea.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Aug 14, 2013

Source: Indian Express

As it celebrates the launch this week of the Vikrant, the much delayed first indigenous aircraft carrier, India is not the only one in Asia focused on the virtues of airpower at sea. While the Western powers are struggling to maintain their existing aircraft carriers, leading Asian nations are investing, big time, in naval aviation. The residual European capabilities for carrier design and construction are actively feeding into Asian warship-building.

India also plans to build a larger second indigenous aircraft carrier in the coming years. Meanwhile, it has begun the sea trials of the long awaited Vikramaditya, the carrier acquired from Russia (the Gorshkov). By the end of the next decade, the Indian navy should be close to realising the dream of operating three carriers. But India, the first Asian country to acquire an aircraft carrier after World War II, will no longer have monopoly over naval airpower in the region.

China, Japan, Russia, Korea and Australia are all beefing up airpower capabilities at sea. Aircraft carriers were, until recently, the symbol of American naval primacy in Asia. But airpower at sea is now integral to the regional military balance in Asia. As the naval ambitions of the regional powers intersect in the Indo-Pacific, there will be much jockeying for positions of advantage in the waters of Asia.

Beijing's anxieties about the expanding naval capabilities of Japan and India are mirrored by New Delhi's concerns about the rising Chinese naval presence in the Indian Ocean. Future maritime balance in Asia will be shaped not just by the individual capabilities of Asian powers, but the kind of alignments they might generate among themselves and with the United States.

Asian Flat--Tops

China, which is building a powerful blue water navy, commissioned its first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, last year. Like the Vikramaditya, the Liaoning is a refurbished version of a carrier built in the Soviet Union many years ago. Like India, China has plans to have more than one carrier and is building an indigenous carrier of its own. Reports also suggest that a nuclear powered aircraft carrier may be on Beijing's drawing board.

Meanwhile, Japan and South Korea are boosting naval aviation. Both operate helicopter carriers. Japan had commissioned two powerful Hyuga-class destroyers carrying helicopters in 2009 and 2011. Korea has one helicopter carrier called Dokdo in operation since 2005 and is building a second one. Russia too is constructing a helicopter carrier, named Vladivostok, in collaboration with France. If it does join the Russian Pacific fleet, it will underline Moscow's new determination to strengthen its naval power in the waters of Asia. Australia is building two helicopter carriers, Canberra and Adelaide, which are expected to be commissioned in the next few years.

The helicopter carriers may not have the profile of their muscular cousins, but will have a profound impact on the Asian maritime security environment.

Japan's Izumo

Japan's commissioning of a third helicopter carrier, the Izumo, last week has created a flutter in East Asia. The Izumo is much larger than the two Hyuga-class destroyers and, at 24,000 tonnes, is the biggest ship now in the Japanese navy. Japan says the Izumo's tasks include disaster relief and the rescue of its overseas nationals trapped in crises. China, however, is not impressed by the humanitarian justification for the Izumo. Chinese analysts have called the Izumo an "aircraft carrier in disguise" and believe is meant for power projection. In a formal statement, China's defence ministry called on Tokyo to reflect on its imperial history and limit itself to self-defence.

Given the enduring memories of Japan's colonial occupation, some in Asia are deeply concerned about the resurgence of Japanese nationalism and its attempt to break out of the political constraints of the post-war pacifist constitution. For the current leadership of Japan, though, the logic is different. Facing a rising China and concerned about the growing reluctance of its only ally, the US, to be drawn into Tokyo's conflicts with Beijing, Japan may have no choice but to tone of up its military muscle.

Not everyone in Asia, however, is worried about Japan. Some are looking for Japanese military support to counter Chinese assertiveness. Vietnam and the Philippines, two countries that came under Japanese colonialism, are now eagerly seeking greater naval cooperation with Tokyo.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.
 

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
SecurityMilitaryArms ControlSouth AsiaIndiaEast AsiaSouth KoreaChinaJapan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Macron Makes France a Great Middle Power

    France has stopped clinging to notions of being a great power and is embracing the middle power moment. But Emmanuel Macron has his work cut out if he is to secure his country’s global standing before his term in office ends.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    How Can Europe Renew a Stalled Enlargement Process?

    Despite offering security benefits to candidates and the EU alike, the enlargement agenda appears stalled. Why is progress not being made, and is it time for Europe to rethink its approach?

      Sylvie Goulard, Gerald Knaus

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?

    EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    To Survive, the EU Must Split

    Leaning into a multispeed Europe that includes the UK is the way Europeans don’t get relegated to suffering what they must, while the mighty United States and China do what they want.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.