• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Dmitri Trenin"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The Battle for Ukraine

The Russian-Ukrainian economic agreements look like Putin’s victory, but the Kremlin will have to deal with an array of powerful opponents. The battle for Ukraine has entered a new stage.

Link Copied
By Dmitri Trenin
Published on Dec 18, 2013

The Russian-Ukrainian economic agreements concluded on December 17, 2013, at the Kremlin look like a victory for President Vladimir Putin. As an anonymous Kremlin official told a Kommersant reporter, "They are now ours." True, the victory has come at a considerable cost: slashing the gas price by one-third and buying $15 billion worth of Ukrainian securities, an equivalent of extending a credit line. Putin, however, aims at something far bigger: integration of Ukraine into the Moscow-led Eurasian geopolitical unit.

In reality, this is a gamble. If Ukraine were really leaning toward Russia, no price would be too high to bail it out. This, however, is not the case now. Putin will have to work very hard indeed to persuade the Ukrainian economic elite and its political clients that they are better off with Russia than slowly walking toward the EU: a tough sell. Putin also knows he can trust almost no one of the Ukrainian politicians or oligarchs. As he makes Yanukovych and Co. an offer they cannot refuse, Putin will probably have to help a new pro-Russian Ukrainian elite emerge. This new elite will have to come up with a new Ukrainian project, to replace the current one which is built on Ukraine being apart from Russia. A very tall order, if at all possible—but unless Russia can accomplish this feat, it will eventually lose.

These are long-term goals. Meanwhile, the Kremlin will have to deal with an array of powerful opponents. The Euromaidan, as expected, has seen the Kremlin accords as Yanukovych's sellout to Putin. The Maidan of course will dissipate before the Christmas break and will not reconvene automatically. Its leaders are clearly not giants. However, the Maidan represents a new stage in the formation of a Ukrainian nation which sees itself as part of Europe, not Eurasia. The EU, now, must secretly feel relieved: it is off the hook, having narrowly escaped the disaster of taking responsibility for a huge basket case. It will not, however, accept defeat easily and will work with the Maidan in the future. For the United States, Russia's geopolitical advance is unacceptable, and Washington will work to stymie it. With presidential elections in Ukraine scheduled for early 2015, next year looks crucial in determining the future direction of that country. Russia's bid has been accepted; the battle for Ukraine has entered a new stage.

About the Author

Dmitri Trenin

Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center

Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space

      Dmitri Trenin

  • Commentary
    What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West Revealed

      Dmitri Trenin

Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
EconomyForeign PolicyRussiaEastern EuropeUkraine

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The Fog of AI War

    In Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran, AI warfare has come to dominate, with barely any oversight or accountability. Europe must lead the charge on the responsible use of new military technologies.

      Raluca Csernatoni

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How to Join the EU in Three Easy Steps

    Montenegro and Albania are frontrunners for EU enlargement in the Western Balkans, but they can’t just sit back and wait. To meet their 2030 accession ambitions, they must make a strong positive case.

      Dimitar Bechev, Iliriana Gjoni

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?

    Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing It

    Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good Reasons

    The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.

      Marc Pierini

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.