What I encountered in Kyiv a few days ago was sadly familiar for someone who has spent a significant segment of their life there. The population is mired in depression and fear. Mistrust in Ukraine’s government and top leaders is mounting. While no one misses the disgraced former President Yanukovych or wants to submit to the will of Putin’s Russia, the risk of further domestic political turmoil grows by the day.

The Kyiv is overwhelmed with expectations that the worst is yet to come.

 

Tweet This

On and off the battlefield, the army inherited from Soviet times is a mess of corruption and ineffectiveness. The top officer corps is (still) incompetent and widely blamed for a string of setbacks on the battlefield. The generals are also under political pressure from Kyiv to deliver largely symbolic victories; in this way, the town of Debaltsevo has become a new Donetsk airport. In such a context, the brunt of the real fighting is born by volunteer battalions who are not yet properly integrated into the regular army.

The old ways of doing business—through endemic corruption and state capture by oligarchs and their proxies—are still the rule, not the exception. Almost exactly one year after the mass killings on the Maidan, not a single top figure has been jailed for corruption. Even the shooting of innocent protesters by snipers and riot police in the heart of Kyiv has yet to be properly investigated. Despite a surge in national identity, huge numbers of average Ukrainians are balking at signing up for military service, even in the country’s west where nationalist sentiment runs deep. Most do not see the war in Donbas as theirs. To stem draft dodging, the government has pursued restrictions on foreign and even inter-oblast travel for draft-age men. A law recently passed by the parliament allows field commanders to use arms against deserters in the shoot but not kill fashion.

A key issue is that the ruling elite still seems unable or unwilling to communicate clearly with the citizens in the way they deserve to be treated after the heroic days on the Maidan—that is, with honesty and dignity. Instead, the government flits from one unfulfilled promise to another, whether it comes to reclaiming Donbas, reforming ruined institutions, or moving against corruption. Rather than providing Ukrainians with basic information about its plans to cope with the enormous challenges on the military, economic, and social fronts, the government is retreating into dishing out propaganda. But copying the “information war” waged by Russia is at best a distraction. At worst, it creates a virtual world where blame for the government’s failings can be sloughed off or shifted to the people of Ukraine themselves for being insufficiently “patriotic.”

Ukraine must first set achievable goals and start helping itself.

 

Tweet This

The Kyiv I encountered last week is overwhelmed with expectations that the worst is yet to come. The fear comes not only from the war, but from the effects of an economy in free-fall. The sad local reality is that military aid might give a shot in the arm to the Ukrainian army and prolong the war, but unless the West is willing to consider a war against Russia, it will be another distraction from tackling the country’s urgent socio-economic problems and the existential threat they pose to the survival of the government.

To be fair, it is not all bad. A sense of civic volunteerism grows ever stronger where it is needed. Almost 20,000 citizens of Kyiv have signed up to take part in newly formed street police patrols. The impressive reform team in place in key economic ministries has strong backing from the presidential administration. Building on incremental successes like these to stimulate reforms is the best way for the West to assist effectively. But Ukraine must first set achievable goals and start helping itself instead of using Russian aggression—and now Western inaction—as an excuse for all of its domestic shortcomings.