Q&A
Suzanne Maloney, Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour
{
"authors": [
"Karim Sadjadpour"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Iranian Proliferation"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy",
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Iran Nuclear Talks: Settlement Will Hopefully Lead to Lifting of Sanctions
The Iran deal reached last week has created a moment of cautious optimism. The agreement exceeded expectations, but a final deal has yet to be reached.
Published on Apr 7, 2015
Source: France 24 English
Speaking on Franceh 24 English, Carnegie’s Karim Sadjadpour said that the Iranian deal reached last week has created is a moment of cautious optimism. The deal is not yet finalized and many details still need to be figured out. There is also still a question about whether the Iranians are working from the exact same document as that announced by the United States.
The agreement exceeds expectations in both the concreteness of the document and in terms of the duration, Sadjadpour continued. So it certainly did exceed expectations of cynics but it’s still unclear whether the Iranians see this deal exactly the same way as Washington does. He added that there is concern about Iran’s transparency and its seeming unwillingness to open up its program and come clean about its past “flirtations” with nuclear weapons experiments. But, he said, one can understand the Iranian perspective—they don’t want to incriminate themselves. And in a negotiated agreement it is not possible to have “perfection.” This is a very solid deal from the P5+1 perspective, Sadjadpour concluded, and finally for the first time in many years the Iranian people are a winner here as well.In ten to fifteen years, once the verifications in the deal end, there could be dramatic change within Iran, Sadjadpour added. The Iranian supreme leader is 75-years-old; in fifteen years he is going to be 90, if he is still alive. The top generation of revolutionaries will increasingly be out of the scene and Iran will have a population three-quarters, if not eighty percent, of which will have been born after the 1979 revolution. So what is going to happen after verifications end in 15 years should not constitute a major concern now, Sadjadpour asserted.
Sadjadpour added that the Iranian people were celebrating after the deal was announced and this is understandable. Iranian society has been hit hard from two sides. They have been crushed by a repressive regime and crushed by onerous international sanctions. But at the same time the leadership in Iran should manage popular expectations, he warned. The deal is not going to bring about economic deliverance anytime soon. Only a framework was agreed on and not a final deal. But inevitably even if the deal is signed there is going to be disillusionment amongst people who say it did not deliver what they hoped for.
About the Author
Karim Sadjadpour
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Karim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.
- Iran Wanted to Survive the War. Now What?
- What’s Keeping the Iranian Regime in Power—for NowQ&A
Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour, Robin Wright
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Turkey’s Four Headaches Are Also Europe’sArticle
Between stalled economic ties and a push for greater security cooperation, EU-Turkey relations remain uncertain. Ankara’s continued slide toward autocracy is the likeliest common denominator in these competing dynamics.
Marc Pierini
- Member States Must Make Enlargement Their OwnCommentary
The European Commission is preparing the EU for its next enlargement. But member states need to make it a project that European citizens can understand, shape, and support.
Iliriana Gjoni
- Planetary Power: Geoengineering and the New Geopolitics of Climate InterventionResearch
Geoengineering is becoming a geopolitical question as much as a climate one. The way states and the private sector pursue these technologies, assess risks, and drive research increasingly appears focused on gaining a strategic edge. In a field where governance in lagging behind, Europe should keep track of the geopolitical implications if it is to develop effective regulatory frameworks.
Olivia Lazard, ed.
- Taking the Pulse: Is Burnham’s EU Policy Bold Enough?Commentary
Resetting relations with the EU is a central plank of the UK’s current foreign policy. Is Andy Burnham being bold enough or is he falling into the same trap as his predecessors, misreading the power dynamic?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Europe Needs its own Sanctions-Enforcement MuscleCommentary
The EU can impose sanctions but struggles to enforce them without the United States. With Washington increasingly disinterested in backing European interests, the bloc must now fend for itself.
Nicu Popescu, Tiago Antunes
