• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Judy Dempsey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "EU Integration and Enlargement",
    "Brexit and UK Politics"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "EP",
  "programs": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Europe",
    "Western Europe",
    "United Kingdom",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "EU",
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

Europe Has an Irish Problem

Whether European leaders realize it or not, the future stability of Ireland and of the Northern Ireland peace process rests with Brussels, not London.

Link Copied
By Judy Dempsey
Published on Jun 26, 2017

Source: Washington Post

Last month, Michel Barnier found himself among a herd of cows. There he was, meandering in lush green fields, but not in his native France.

The European Union’s top diplomat leading the Brexit talks to negotiate Britain’s exit from the E.U. was straddling the invisible border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

As the cows looked on at the well-dressed diplomats trudging through the fields, Barnier said he wanted to understand the challenge Europe faces in making sure that the historic 1998 Good Friday Agreement that ended the decades-long conflict in Northern Ireland would not fall asunder.

“Many in Ireland fear the return of tensions in the North,” Barnier had earlier told a joint session of the houses of Parliament in Dublin. “Only 15 years ago did checkpoints and controls totally disappear. Thanks to the Good Friday Agreement that ended decades of violence.” Then he added, “Brexit changes the external borders of the E.U. I will work with you to avoid a hard border.”

Whether other European leaders realize it or not, the future stability of Ireland and the peace process rests with Brussels, not London. When it comes to the Brexit negotiations, Brussels is in the driver’s seat. In practice, this is the E.U.’s great chance to be flexible and creative in pushing for a soft border between Northern Ireland and Ireland instead of cementing divisions on the island.

“Brexit is such a big strategic issue for the E.U.” said Ben Tonra, professor of international relations at University College Dublin. “It is about the stability of Europe’s most western neighborhood.”

British Prime Minister Theresa May isn’t helping matters. To prop up her minority Conservative government, she has turned to the staunchly conservative Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), Northern Ireland’s biggest political party. The timing couldn’t be worse.

On Monday, May won over the DUP by promising Northern Ireland an extra $1.3 billion over the next two years, sweetened by raising pensions by 2.5 percent each year. This at a time when the government has been reducing its support to the devolved regions of Scotland and Wales.

The government in Northern Ireland collapsed in January over a heating bill scandal. Since then, the DUP which supports the union with Britain, and its coalition partners, the nationalist Sinn Fein party, which supports the unification of Ireland, have been bickering over how to revive the executive.

If they don’t reach an agreement by June 29, the British government will impose direct rule over the province. That would be an enormous blow to the peace process, which gave the province the right to govern itself.

“A deal between the DUP and [Britain’s] Conservatives could complicate the situation in Northern Ireland,” Andrew Gilmore, Brexit expert at the Dublin-based Institute of International and European Affairs, said to me. “With the DUP so close to the heart of power in Westminster, a return to direct rule from London could be problematic,” he added. Direct rule would rob Northern Ireland of having a real say in the Brexit negotiations. Not only that, the Good Friday Agreement specifically states that the British government must exercise “rigorous impartiality” in its dealing with all the communities in Northern Ireland.

“Northern Ireland needs its own voice, in the context of Brexit in particular as well as so many other issues that need to be resolved,” Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney said. “Without that voice people in Northern Ireland will be disadvantaged in a major way and will be essentially relying on others to make the case for them,” he told politicians in Northern Ireland.

He had no illusions about what was at stake. “I think it’s fair to say that Northern Ireland is perhaps the most vulnerable part of Europe to a bad Brexit deal should that happen.”

With days left to revive home rule in Northern Ireland, the good news is that with some exceptions, both the DUP and Sinn Fein oppose a hard border consisting of controls and checks between Northern Ireland and Ireland. “This is despite the fact that the majority of DUP voters opted for Brexit, said Federico Fabbrini, director of the Brexit research and policy at Dublin City University, in an interview.

Once Britain leaves the E.U., Ireland becomes an external border to the E.U. That should mean the imposition of border controls between Northern Ireland, which will leave the E.U., and Ireland, which will remain. That’s how it is between E.U. member Poland and non E.U.-member Belarus. Barnier knows that it would require consensus from all 27 member states to grant an exemption to reestablishing border crossings on the island of Ireland.

Then there are the E.U.’s four freedoms — freedom of movement, of labor, of capital and of services that have helped to underpin the Good Friday Agreement. “With Brexit, how do you monitor plumbers crossing the border?” Tonra said. “These are huge issues.”

Barnier seems undaunted. “European integration helped to remove borders that once existed on maps and in minds,” he told the Irish parliamentarians before setting off to the gorgeous invisible border of Lough Egish, with its surrounding meadows and contented cows.

This article was originally published by the Washington Post.

About the Author

Judy Dempsey

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Europe Needs to Hear What America is Saying

      Judy Dempsey

  • Commentary
    Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European Populists

      Judy Dempsey

Judy Dempsey
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Judy Dempsey
EUPolitical ReformEuropeWestern EuropeUnited KingdomIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    The Iran War’s Dangerous Fallout for Europe

    The drone strike on the British air base in Akrotiri brings Europe’s proximity to the conflict in Iran into sharp relief. In the fog of war, old tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean risk being reignited, and regional stakeholders must avoid escalation.

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Needs a Third Way in Iran

    European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.

      Richard Youngs

  • Trump United Nations multilateralism institutions 2236462680
    Article
    Resetting Cyber Relations with the United States

    For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.

      • Christopher Painter

      Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not Less

    Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.

      Dimitar Bechev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.