• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
Chechen Murders Put Kadyrov In the Hot Seat

Source: Getty

Article
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Chechen Murders Put Kadyrov In the Hot Seat

Questions remain whether Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov ordered the recent murders of human rights activists in Chechnya, or whether the crimes were an attempt by his opponents to discredit his leadership.

Link Copied
By Alexey Malashenko
Published on Aug 14, 2009

Chechen Murders Put Kadyrov In the Hot SeatThe recent murders of human right activists in Chechnya raise questions whose answers are both difficult and fraught with contradictions. Who has committed the crimes, and who benefits by them?

Some claim that Chechen president Ramzan Kadyrov gave the order to assassinate Natalya Estimirova, Zarema Sadulaeva and her husband, Alik Djabrailov. Relations between the Chechen leader and NGOs are not friendly, and investigations of murders, kidnappings, torture and other human rights violations irritate Mr. Kadyrov. Kadyrov’s reaction to his critics is generally negative, and he has shown a preference to be rid of such investigators.

Nevertheless, it is difficult to argue that Kadyrov is interested in killing his opponents, and in some ways, he has even attempted to improve his public image. He has invited the leader of Chechen emigration, Ahmed Zakaev, to return to Russia, and offered him the post of Minister of Culture. Kadyrov has also pursued an all-Chechen congress, and expressed an increasing desire to talk to the liberal mass media. Thus, Kadyrov appears to want to show that he is no longer a “cruel Caucasian barbarian.”

Yet Kadyrov also senses the Kremlin’s disappointment in his leadership. The federal center no longer trusts in his absolute ability to control the situation in the republic. Russian president Dmitry Medvedev considers the assassination of the three human right activists a sign of Kadyrov’s weakness. Moscow is also unhappy with Kadyrov’s growing ambitions. In addition to trying his best to remove federal supervisory structures, he constantly claims Chechnya is a “special subject” of the Russian Federation and demands increasing plenary powers.

But if Kadyrov is not responsible for the murders, who could have organized them? There are some possible options.

Maybe they were carried out by forces in Chechnya who want to compromise Kadyrov in the eyes of Moscow, and thereby signal that in time the Center will be obliged to replace him. The tragedy could perhaps also be the work of the wahhabi Islamist opposition, who also use every possible chance to show Kadyrov is not in control -- though that is less likely. One cannot ignore the fact that in Moscow itself, there are those who would like to compromise the Chechen president.

In any event, Kadyrov is obliged to explain his innocence, a responsibility he has never much liked.

About the Author

Alexey Malashenko

Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program

Malashenko is a former chair of the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Religion, Society, and Security Program.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    What Will Uzbekistan’s New President Do?

      Alexey Malashenko

  • Commentary
    Preserving the Calm in Russia’s Muslim Community

      Alexey Malashenko

Alexey Malashenko
Former Scholar in Residence, Religion, Society, and Security Program
Alexey Malashenko
CaucasusRussiaPolitical Reform

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Needs a Third Way in Iran

    European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.

      Richard Youngs

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Can Europe Still Matter in Syria?

    Europe’s interests in Syria extend beyond migration management, yet the EU trails behind other players in the country’s post-Assad reconstruction. To boost its influence in Damascus, the union must upgrade its commitment to ensuring regional stability.

      Bianka Speidl, Hanga Horváth-Sántha

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europolis, Where Europe Ends

    A prophetic Romanian novel about a town at the mouth of the Danube carries a warning: Europe decays when it stops looking outward. In a world of increasing insularity, the EU should heed its warning.

      Thomas de Waal

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe Falls Behind in the South Caucasus Connectivity Race

    The EU lacks leadership and strategic planning in the South Caucasus, while the United States is leading the charge. To secure its geopolitical interests, Brussels must invest in new connectivity for the region.

      Zaur Shiriyev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.