Judy Dempsey
{
"authors": [
"Judy Dempsey"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe",
"Eastern Europe"
],
"topics": [
"EU",
"Democracy"
]
}Source: Getty
How the Legacy of Poland’s Dissidents Is Being Challenged
Jan Litynski, a leading dissident under Poland’s communist regime and later a passionate defender of the rule of law, will be buried on March 10 in Warsaw. The values and principles he fought for are now under threat more than ever before.
It was a tiny kitchen. But how Helena Łuczywo could make space to seat at least six people around her small table! It was the early summer of 1980. Apart from the enduring smell of black tobacco cigarettes, the next-door living room was full to bursting with publications that Łuczywo had to edit and quickly distribute to the underground movement.
Here, in this apartment in a Warsaw suburb, Łuczywo introduced me to so many special people. One of them was Jan Lityński. This feisty, funny, and warm intellectual was—like his dissident friends—indefatigable. In the late 1970s, with Jacek Kuron, he founded the Workers’ Defense Committee. This was, in some ways, the precursor to the independent Solidarity trade union movement, which was established in August 1980 in Gdańsk.
Poland’s dissidents paid a very heavy price for activities aimed at challenging the communist regime’s monopoly. In March 1968, during student protests at Warsaw University, Lityński, then twenty-two years old, and many others were expelled. He was given a two-year jail sentence. At the same time, the regime unleashed a vicious anti-Semitic campaign, forcing many intellectuals to emigrate to Paris, London, or Stockholm.
In exile, they continued to support the underground movement, smuggling in xeroxing machines, carbon paper (remember those flimsy sheets?), newsletters, journals, paper, and printing ink (which weighed down my baggage allowance).
Those who remained continued their opposition activities. They were undeterred by the repression. They expanded the underground, which leaped into the open in the summer of 1980 with Solidarity. The fear, punctured by the historic visit in 1979 of the Polish-born Pope John Paul II to his homeland, was gone.
It’s hard to forget those euphoric, unpredictable months of Solidarity. By December 1981, Poland’s communist party—and, of course, the Kremlin—had had enough. Martial law was imposed. Lityński was interned until September 1982, then imprisoned. On his release, he returned to the underground, paving the way for 1989, when the communists and the opposition agreed on a peaceful transition to democracy. Over the next two decades, he remained engaged.
Lityński, who drowned in February while trying to rescue his dog, will be buried on March 10 beside Kuron and other leading dissidents.
I’m writing about Lityński not only because he and his friends taught me about the preciousness of freedom and about life without freedom but also because memories are very short—and selective. And the younger generation often knows little about their parents’ or their country’s immediate past.
But there’s another, more fundamental reason. What Lityński and the dissidents fought for is now being challenged by Poland’s governing Law and Justice (PiS) party, led by Jarosław Kaczyński.
Kaczyński was a Solidarity supporter and a member of the 1989 roundtable negotiations. But since taking power in 2015—after a brief stint in 2005–2007—PiS has done everything to demonize Poland’s dissidents, attack its intellectual elites, and, above all, undermine the rule of law and the checks and balances that form the cornerstone of the Polish constitution.
PiS has often justified its attack on the judiciary on the grounds that communist-era judges were not sacked after 1989. Nearly thirty-two years since the roundtable negotiations, that claim hardly holds water. In reality, PiS’s assault on the judiciary, which amounts to a consistent vendetta and smear campaigns against independent-minded judges, is because checks and balances designed to protect Poland’s democratic institutions stand in the way of PiS’s agenda.
PiS set out this agenda in its party program back in 2009, when it was in opposition. Kaczyński referred to “legal impossibilism” and “the over-idealistic understanding of division and balance of power among the branches of governments.” He criticized judges who ruled contrary to PiS’s vision of the Polish national interest as harboring a hatred of their native country.
The attack on the judiciary is nonstop. Here is a tweet written on March 6 by Wojciech Sadurski, a leading Polish constitutional lawyer who is PiS’s bête noir and now lives outside his country:
Important! A judge who handed down an acquittal in my case earlier today, a few hrs later became target of vicious assault by TVP: a state body, and an unsuccessful prosecutor. Their official statement is offensive and threatening. I will keep you informed if persecutions follow. https://t.co/UKnIC8EJc6
— Wojciech Sadurski (@WojSadurski) March 6, 2021
The EU has more than enough information and evidence to know that Poland’s rule of law is being systematically stripped of its independence. But somehow, the bloc is unwilling to protect something as vital as an independent judiciary and the constitutional principles that underpin democracy. That is what Lityński fought for before and after 1989. Does the EU want to bury that legacy?
About the Author
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe
- Europe Needs to Hear What America is SayingCommentary
- Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European PopulistsCommentary
Judy Dempsey
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Strategic Europe
- Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come TogetherCommentary
The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.
Rym Momtaz
- Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?Commentary
French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not LessCommentary
Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.
Dimitar Bechev
- Europe on Iran: Gone with the WindCommentary
Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.
Pierre Vimont