In The Media
Vikram Nehru
{
"authors": [
"Vikram Nehru"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Southeast Asia",
"Myanmar"
],
"topics": []
}
Source: Getty
Other
Introducing Myanmar Votes 2015
Myanmar’s 2015 general election will be a key milestone for the country. Yet, with three transitions under way, Myanmar’s task is enormous and the path littered with pitfalls.
By Vikram Nehru
Published on Apr 30, 2015
Myanmar will be going to the polls in late October or early November 2015, in what could be the most important election ever held in the history of the country. The general election will be a key milestone in Myanmar’s transition from military authoritarianism to democracy.
But the buildup to the vote and the final outcome will be colored by the broader context of Myanmar’s unfortunate legacy of six decades of authoritarian rule. That system led to international isolation, weakened institutions, widespread social distrust, and a civil war that drained the country of blood and treasure and stymied any hope of building social cohesion.
Myanmar is in the throes of three transitions: from military rule to democracy, from conflict to peace, and from state-driven to market-driven development. Any one of these transitions would normally be fraught with uncertainty. But Myanmar is attempting all three at once, and the interactions between them will inevitably trigger unpredictable vortices and crosscurrents that could endanger one or more of the transitions and, worse, threaten the very stability of the country.
In many respects, Myanmar has embarked on a path that no country in transition has traversed before. China and Vietnam liberalized their economies but not their polities; the Soviet Union pursued glasnost before perestroika. Myanmar is trying to achieve both political and economic liberalization while at the same time trying to bring to an end the world’s longest-running civil war in modern times. No one should underestimate the enormity of Myanmar’s ambitious task or overestimate the likelihood of its success.
Through seminars, articles, infographics, and more, the Myanmar Votes 2015 project will follow and analyze the run-up to the election in Myanmar and the forces that are likely to shape and influence the outcome. Five factors are likely to have the most impact: the role of the military, the peace process under way between armed ethnic groups and the government, communal tensions, political parties and personalities, and the economy. In addition to analyzing each of these forces, the Myanmar Votes 2015 project will help readers understand the complexities of the country’s electoral process and the likelihood and implications of proposed constitutional amendments.
If the election is held successfully, and the Myanmar people and the rest of the world consider the vote to be free and fair, then there would be cause for celebration. At the same time, there should be little doubt that the country would only be at the very beginning of a long road toward building a society that is just, peaceful, stable, and prosperous.
As all three transitions gradually unfold and the inevitable challenges and setbacks emerge, the international community must remain supportive, understanding, and patient. The people of Myanmar—more than anyone else—are keen to put the past behind them and to work together for a brighter future. This is their fight and their struggle, and the international community’s role should be neither to judge nor to hinder, but to help.
Stay Tuned: Resources and analysis from the Myanmar Votes 2015 project will be available online in May 2015.
About the Author
Vikram Nehru
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Nehru was a nonresident senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program. An expert on development economics, growth, poverty reduction, debt sustainability, governance, and the performance and prospects of East Asia, his research focuses on the economic, political, and strategic issues confronting Asia, particularly Southeast Asia.
- Southeast Asia, the Redback, and Reality
- Now Comes Aung San Suu Kyi’s True Test of LeadershipIn The Media
Vikram Nehru
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Shadow of the Military in Modern South AsiaArticle
Military rule is now a defining political factor in South Asia. Here’s how analysts can understand and account for it.
Paul Staniland
- Leveraging Internal Security Cooperation with Vietnam Offers a Glimpse of Future Chinese Diplomacy with Southeast AsiaArticle
Despite long-standing differences, China and Vietnam are reinforcing common ground for collaboration, especially in public security. This internal security–centered diplomacy offers a strengthened road map for how China moves forward with Southeast Asia.
Sophie Zhuang
- Southeast Asia’s Agency Amid the New Oil CrisisCommentary
There is no better time for the countries of Southeast Asia to reconsider their energy security than during this latest crisis.
Gita Wirjawan
- Fuel Crisis Forces Politically Perilous Trade-Offs in IndonesiaCommentary
As conflict in the Middle East drives up fuel costs across Asia, Indonesia faces difficult policy trade-offs over subsidies, inflation, and fiscal credibility. President Prabowo’s personalized governance style may make these hard choices even harder to navigate.
Sana Jaffrey
- In Its Iran War Debate, Washington Has Lost the Plot in AsiaCommentary
The United States ignores the region’s lived experience—and the tough political and social trade-offs the war has produced—at its peril.
Evan A. Feigenbaum
