Other
François Godement, Ashley J. Tellis
{
"authors": [
"François Godement"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Is the Chinese Economy Drifting, Tanking or Changing?
2019 is a year full of ambiguities for the Chinese economy, mainly due to two reasons.
Published on Jan 24, 2019
Source: Institut Montaigne
2019 is a year full of ambiguities for the Chinese economy, mainly due to two reasons. The first is the important psychological pressures caused by the US-China trade war, which could potentially reverse the global trade trends that were largely dominated by China in the last decades. The second is the unclear messages conveyed by the Chinese government regarding its economic policy. In response to pressures coming from abroad, the government has alluded to possible reforms. Yet it has also taken defensive measures in order to resist these pressures. It has intensified its efforts to restrain domestic debts and liabilities. Yet at the same time, it has also adopted new stimulus measures, including new credit lines, to revive the economy. Adapt and resist, stop and go... No wonder that, after a phase of seeming invulnerability to US pressures, Chinese economists are showing signs of anxiety. Indeed, not only is the economy drifting, but it might also be tanking.
Such observations could however end up being the mere expression of unfounded pessimism after a phase of unbridled optimism.
The trade conflict has already had two significant consequences.
- The first was the reboost of China’s exports to the United States, up until October 2018. A drop in the RMB to dollar exchange rate, and a rush to get exports past the gate before the late September tariff increases resulted in China’s highest ever trade surplus with the United States. China’s global imports also accelerated. This was likely caused by consumers’ and companies’ anticipation of tariffs and other upcoming import restrictions.
- Meanwhile, the government has been consolidating a familiar policy: reining in speculation and bursting the economic "bubbles". It is the very policy that had been implemented, on the eve of the Great Financial Crisis of 2007-2009. At the time, China’s credit and budget discipline was perhaps purely coincidental, but it significantly helped to avoid widespread panic when the global crisis hit. Now, given that China is one of the trade war’s two main players, it is easier for authorities to foresee trouble and thus to tighten their control over runaway credit and finance. Official statements in the spring of 2018 started praising state enterprises and the state economy again. Shadow banking, which, in China, really is the "shadow of banks" and plays a significant role in structured funds with higher returns for savers, was brutally curtailed. So was, consequently, credit to private companies: no doubt the one-party state is in a good position to protect itself from the forecasted storm. However, local authorities have been hit both by anti-corruption campaigns and by a major curtailing of infrastructure projects. This also explains state companies' frenzy to get involved in the international Belt & Road projects. In 2018, investment dropped like never before in China.
This article was originally published by Institut Montaigne.
About the Author
François Godement
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Godement, an expert on Chinese and East Asian strategic and international affairs, was a nonresident senior fellow in the Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Reorienting China Policy By Working With Europe
- China at the Gates: A New Power Audit of EU-China RelationsIn The Media
François Godement, Abigaël Vasselier
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Iran War’s Global ReachCollection
As the war between the United States, Israel, and Iran continues, Carnegie scholars contribute cutting-edge analysis on the events of the war and their wide-reaching implications. From the impact on Iran and its immediate neighbors to the responses from Gulf states to fuel and fertilizer shortages caused by the effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, the war is reshaping Middle East alliances and creating shockwaves around the world. Carnegie experts analyze it all.
- Southeast Asia’s Agency Amid the New Oil CrisisCommentary
There is no better time for the countries of Southeast Asia to reconsider their energy security than during this latest crisis.
Gita Wirjawan
- Fuel Crisis Forces Politically Perilous Trade-Offs in IndonesiaCommentary
As conflict in the Middle East drives up fuel costs across Asia, Indonesia faces difficult policy trade-offs over subsidies, inflation, and fiscal credibility. President Prabowo’s personalized governance style may make these hard choices even harder to navigate.
Sana Jaffrey
- In Its Iran War Debate, Washington Has Lost the Plot in AsiaCommentary
The United States ignores the region’s lived experience—and the tough political and social trade-offs the war has produced—at its peril.
Evan A. Feigenbaum
- What GDP Means in a Soft Budget Economy Like ChinaCommentary
The GDP measure is an attempt to measure value creation in an economy. This measure, however, can vary greatly between economies that have disciplinary mechanisms that force them to recognize investment losses quickly and economies that don’t, and can postpone this recognition for many years.
Michael Pettis
