Other
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Cause for Concern at Japan’s Damaged Fukushima Nuclear Plant
In Japan’s damaged Fukushima nuclear plant, six spent fuel pools and three reactor cores have the potential to release significant radiation into the atmosphere.
Published on Mar 16, 2011
Source: CBS
KATIE COURIC, CBS ANCHOR: James Acton in Washington is a nuclear safety expert with the Carnegie Endowment. James, what is the biggest cause for concern at this point?
JAMES ACTON, CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT: Well, Katie right now the biggest cause for concern is probably the highly radioactive used nuclear fuel, because that material is sitting outside of the heavily reinforced containment building. And all that`s standing between it and the outside world is a big pool of water, and a weak outer containment shell.
COURIC: The head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said today that it believes that around the reactor site, there are high levels of radiation, potentially lethal doses that may prevent emergency workers from getting near the reactors. What is your reaction to that?
ACTON: It is clearly deeply concerning. But we’ve seen in the limited history of nuclear disasters some extraordinary acts of heroism, and I’m thinking here in particular of the Soviet workers during the Chernobyl accident who after that massive explosion that blew a hole in the roof, went up on the roof and literally with shovels, put used nuclear fuel back down into the reactor core. And I have no doubt whatsoever that if the need calls -- and we very much hope it doesn`t -- but if the need calls for those Japanese workers they`re going to show every bit the same level of bravery.
COURIC: If the situation doesn`t improve, James, what is the worst- case scenario here?
ACTON: You know, we now have nine different areas of concern. We have six spent fuel pools, and we have three reactor cores. And all of those have the potential to lead to significant releases of radiation into the environment. I think the worst case here, which is very serious, is long-term, it would be an increase in the rate of cancer as a result of radiation. But I think, again, it`s worth emphasizing -- we`re unlikely to see a catastrophic release of radiation on the scale of Chernobyl, and the number of deaths that result from this reactor incident is likely to be far below the number killed in the tsunami.
COURIC: James Acton.
About the Author
James M. Acton
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy
- Trump Has an Out on Nuclear Testing. He Should Take It.Commentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Leveraging Internal Security Cooperation with Vietnam Offers a Glimpse of Future Chinese Diplomacy with Southeast AsiaArticle
Despite long-standing differences, China and Vietnam are reinforcing common ground for collaboration, especially in public security. This internal security–centered diplomacy offers a strengthened road map for how China moves forward with Southeast Asia.
Sophie Zhuang
- Digital Hegemony and the Reification of Taiwan’s “Unification-Independence” DichotomyArticle
Governments now deploy online platforms to shape public opinion and influence collective cognition. This is acutely apparent between China and Taiwan.
Frank Cheng-Shan Liu
- China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of EverythingCommentary
Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.
Damien Ma
- In Its Iran War Debate, Washington Has Lost the Plot in AsiaCommentary
The United States ignores the region’s lived experience—and the tough political and social trade-offs the war has produced—at its peril.
Evan A. Feigenbaum
- Japan’s Security Policy Is Still Caught Between the Alliance and Domestic RealityArticle
Japan’s response to U.S. pressure over Hormuz highlights a broader dilemma: How to preserve the alliance while remaining bound by legal limits, public opinion, and an Asia-centered security agenda. Tokyo gained diplomatic space through an alliance-embracing strategy, but only under conditions that may not endure.
Ryo Sahashi
