- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
{
"authors": [
"James M. Acton"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy",
"Nuclear Energy"
]
}Source: Getty
Pivotal Moment in Japan?
Much remains unknown as Japan attempts to cool the nuclear reactors and spent fuel rods at its damaged Fukushima nuclear plant, including whether restoring electricity to the cooling systems will help prevent the crisis from growing.
Source: CBS
KATIE COURIC, CBS: James Acton with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is a physicist and an expert on nuclear safety. James, Japanese officials acknowledged what U.S. officials said yesterday, those spent fuel rods, more than 11,000 of them in rapidly evaporating pools are the real danger. Why initially were there two different assessments of the situation?
JAMES ACTON, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: In many ways I think there probably still are two different assessments of the situation. There`s no question that the evaporating fuel pools is serious. Without all of that water as shielding, this site is going to become much more heavily irradiated and consequently harder to move around and work it. But I think there`s a genuine disagreement here over the chances that without the cooling effect of water these fuel rods could ignite. And there`s a disagreement over how risky that is compared to the consequences of a meltdown.
COURIC: Are helicopters and water hoses really the best solution to this crisis?
ACTON: Probably yes is the answer to that one. We’re far beyond the playbook on this. There`s no manual, there`s no emergency equipment, to deal with this kind of extreme situation. So right now the Japanese government are being forced to improvise.
COURIC: If the power comes on, will that solve the problem?
ACTON: I don`t know, but this is going to be a pivotal moment when the power comes on because if the cooling systems in the reactors and fuel ponds are basically sound and then the power comes on, then that -- We might look at that moment as the beginning of the end of this crisis. If, however, the cooling systems are damaged and the power comes on, they might not function correctly and this crisis could continue.
COURIC: James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment. Thank you.
ACTON: Thank you, Katie.
About the Author
Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security StrategyOther
- Trump Has an Out on Nuclear Testing. He Should Take It.Commentary
James M. Acton
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Leveraging Internal Security Cooperation with Vietnam Offers a Glimpse of Future Chinese Diplomacy with Southeast AsiaArticle
Despite long-standing differences, China and Vietnam are reinforcing common ground for collaboration, especially in public security. This internal security–centered diplomacy offers a strengthened road map for how China moves forward with Southeast Asia.
Sophie Zhuang
- Digital Hegemony and the Reification of Taiwan’s “Unification-Independence” DichotomyArticle
Governments now deploy online platforms to shape public opinion and influence collective cognition. This is acutely apparent between China and Taiwan.
Frank Cheng-Shan Liu
- China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of EverythingCommentary
Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.
Damien Ma
- In Its Iran War Debate, Washington Has Lost the Plot in AsiaCommentary
The United States ignores the region’s lived experience—and the tough political and social trade-offs the war has produced—at its peril.
Evan A. Feigenbaum
- Japan’s Security Policy Is Still Caught Between the Alliance and Domestic RealityArticle
Japan’s response to U.S. pressure over Hormuz highlights a broader dilemma: How to preserve the alliance while remaining bound by legal limits, public opinion, and an Asia-centered security agenda. Tokyo gained diplomatic space through an alliance-embracing strategy, but only under conditions that may not endure.
Ryo Sahashi