• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Faysal Abbas Mohamad"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Sada",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "The Gaza War and Regional Reverberations"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}
Attribution logo
Commentary
Sada

Amid Escalation Between Iran and Israel, Will Assad Look to the Arab States?

Iran’s adventurism may push Damascus to commit to Saudi-led efforts and reintegrate into the Arab fold.

Link Copied
By Faysal Abbas Mohamad
Published on Apr 23, 2024
Sada

Blog

Sada

Sada is an online journal rooted in Carnegie’s Middle East Program that seeks to foster and enrich debate about key political, economic, and social issues in the Arab world and provides a venue for new and established voices to deliver reflective analysis on these issues.

Learn More
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

Mounting tensions between Israel and Iran have placed the regime of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad in an increasingly uncomfortable position. The Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus on April 1, the retaliatory Iranian assault on Israel 12 days later, and the most recent Israeli airstrikes on Iranian soil—which marked an unprecedented escalation in the low-intensity shadow war between Tel Aviv and Tehran—risks catalyzing a much wider conflagration. 

Despite its performative rhetoric, the regime in Damascus has long sought to avoid any direct confrontation with Israel. Could the prospect of an Iranian response to Israel from Syrian territory lead the regime to rethink its relationship with Tehran, and by extension, propel its leadership towards the Arab bloc? 

In exchange for full rapprochement, Arab states have demanded that Damascus commit to three objectives in Syria: a political settlement (largely to facilitate refugee repatriation), a crackdown on drug smuggling, and the reduction of Iran’s influence. Here, Arab states have employed a carrot and stick approach. In the aftermath of the devastating February 2023 earthquake, these states saw an opportunity to deepen engagement with the regime. Pledges for reconstruction finance, for instance, were made alongside enhanced diplomatic contacts with Assad’s regime: the UAE dispatched its ambassador to Damascus in January 2024, after more than a decade without high-level representation, while Saudi Arabia followed its acceptance of the credentials of a Syrian ambassador in December 2023 with the appointment of a charge d’affaires to resume consular activities.

However, since his attendance of the Arab League (AL) summit in May 2023—which ended a twelve-year suspension of Syria’s membership— Assad has not made any serious efforts to meet the AL’s demands, and several states have pushed back against this intransigence. Jordan has gradually expanded its military incursions inside southern Syria in what is likely a Gulf-supported campaign against drug smuggling, an economic lifeline for the regime that is also bolstered by Iran. Frustrated Saudi officials also reportedly repudiated Assad in November 2023 for failing to accommodate Arab demands.

Despite increasingly vocal critiques from the Saudi-led bloc, and mounting escalations between Israel and Iran, Syrian officials have thus far been unrepentant. In the Jeddah summit in May 2023, Assad stated that “changing one’s embrace does not change affiliation,” a clear reference to his alliance with Iran. Assad has also repeatedly charged that the Arab states failed to “offer practical solutions” to the Syrian conflict. Syrian Foreign Minister Faisal al-Mikdad even deflected blame onto the AL for the stalled “step-for-step” paradigm for rehabilitating Syria.

In the current moment, barring a major conflict between Iran and Israel in Syria that could threaten his already tenuous hold on power, Assad is not likely to give in to the pressure of the Arab bloc or to meaningfully dilute his relationship with Iran. Additionally, Iranian calculations make significant escalation with Israel unlikely. While Iran’s response on April 13 was certainly unprecedented, the nature of the attack—which was limited and telegraphed —indicated that it was intended to send a somewhat performative deterrent signal without triggering a massive U.S.-Israeli response. 

Still, Israeli attacks on border areas in southern Lebanon risk igniting a conflict between Hezbollah and Tel Aviv. Given that Iran’s assault on Israel was launched in part from Syrian territory, it is possible any further Israeli retaliation could include an attack on targets across Syria, particularly in the south. In recent weeks, Russia has deployed additional forces to Syrian-controlled areas of the Golan Heights, ostensibly to “de-escalate tensions” in Quneitra and Daraa. Yet they failed to prevent Iran’s recent operation, suggesting that Moscow is unable to contain tensions on this front.

Assad has yet to shift away from Iran and towards meaningful cooperation with neighboring Arab states. However, as hostilities between Israel and Iran increase, Assad’s aversion to risk may finally lead him to distance himself from Iran’s regional adventurism.

Faysal Abbas Mohamad is a retired Syrian-Canadian professor of Middle Eastern politics and international relations, as well as a longtime dissident who was an eyewitness to the Syrian uprising. Follow him on Twitter @fmohamad2.

Faysal Abbas Mohamad

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Sada

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Will Hamas Yield Control of Gaza?

    Six months into the conflict, Hamas continues to challenge the Israeli army—raising questions about Israel’s ability to eradicate the group.

      Reham Owda

  • Commentary
    Sada
    “We Are All Israelis”: The Consequences of Germany’s Staatsräson

    By unconditionally supporting Israel’s war, Germany is increasingly isolating itself on the global stage.

      Lena Obermaier

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Winds of Normalization: Reshaping Saudi Arabia's Image

    Saudi Arabia has long been perceived in the Arab world as a champion of the Palestinian cause, but developments over the past two decades suggest an imminent transformation.

      Safa Nasser

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Palestinian Women in Gaza: Cruel Realities of Displacement

    The story of Reham, a young mother sheltering in Rafah, illustrates the impact of Israel’s war on women and families.

      Shahd Safi

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A Shield or a Weapon: Aspides' Role in Red Sea Security

    Alongside the U.S.-led Operation Prosperity Guidance, the European Union's Aspides naval mission aims to protect the Red Sea region.

      Shimaa Samir Muhammed Hussein

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.