• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUNATO
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Jessica Tuchman Mathews"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East",
    "Iran",
    "Iraq",
    "Yemen",
    "South Asia",
    "Afghanistan",
    "Pakistan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Foreign Policy Challenges in 2010

Efforts to combat terrorism largely defined the global security agenda during the past decade, when small terrorist groups, with as few as three hundred active members, were able to inflict enormous amounts of damage on regional, national, and international scales.

Link Copied
By Jessica Tuchman Mathews
Published on Jan 4, 2010

Source: The Diane Rehm Show

The first decade of the 21st century was marked by a surge in global attention to terrorism. Small terrorist groups, with as few as three hundred active members, have been able to inflict enormous amounts of damage on regional, national, and international scales.

In a panel discussion on the Diane Rehm Show, Jessica Mathews examined the challenges of international terrorism. Explaining that the roots of terrorism cannot be boiled down to merely the issue of poverty, she argued that instead, more attention must be paid to the role of bad governance and corruption which fuels a sense of injustice and anger that finds its outlet in extremism.

Mathews cautioned against drawing too close of a comparison between the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for lessons in combating terrorism. The topography of Iraq and the primarily urban nature of al-Qaeda’s presence there, coupled with a local backlash against al-Qaeda, created a situation that was more favorable for international forces than the situation in Afghanistan.

She also explained that while the situation in Yemen is deteriorating and deserves attention, the greatest concern was the situation in the nuclear-state of Pakistan. “As terrible as the Yemen situation is, if you put it up against Pakistan, that’s where we ought to be focusing our attention,” she said. Preventing terrorists from gaining access to a nuclear weapon has to be the chief concern of antiterrorist forces. The best ways to achieve that goal include preventing terrorists from maintaining a foothold in Pakistan and then taking the long and difficult measures necessary to strengthen the world’s nonproliferation system.

“I think there are historical tidal waves that pass over us, and terrorism is one of them,” she said. “It is the curse of the times in which we live and it will continue to be for many, many years.”

About the Author

Jessica Tuchman Mathews

Distinguished Fellow

Mathews is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. She served as Carnegie’s president for 18 years.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    Washington Already Knows How to Deal with North Korea

      Jessica Tuchman Mathews

  • Commentary
    Trump Wins—and Now?

      Jessica Tuchman Mathews

Jessica Tuchman Mathews
Distinguished Fellow
Jessica Tuchman Mathews
Political ReformSecurityForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesMiddle EastIranIraqYemenSouth AsiaAfghanistanPakistan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Trump Turns NATO into a Tool of Coercion

    The full list of humiliations Europe has endured since Donald Trump returned to the White House makes for grim reading. But Washington’s adversarial approach to its allies undermines its own power base.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Climate desalination plant Saudi Arabia
    Paper
    Ecological Statecraft in the Midst of War: Water, Regeneration, and the Future of Gulf Security

    The U.S.-Iran war has crossed a dangerous threshold: water infrastructure in the Gulf is now a target. Ecological statecraft is no longer peripheral to security, it's part of its foundations.

      • Ali Bin Shahid

      Olivia Lazard, Ali Bin Shahid

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How the EU Can Become Energy Independent

    The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has triggered a global energy crisis, but Europe is stuck in reaction mode. Without more strategic foresight, the EU will remain dependent on fossil fuels and will never be truly secure.

      Milo McBride, Pauline Gerard

  • Commentary
    Deciphering Europe’s Relationship with Turkey

    Debate is heating up on how Turkey could be integrated into a common European defense framework. Commercial and industrial deals offer a better chance at alignment than sweeping political efforts.

      Marc Pierini

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is it Worth it for Europeans to Placate Trump?

    After spending much of 2025 trying to placate Donald Trump, some European leaders are starting to change posture. But is even a hostile Washington still so important to Europe that the U.S. president’s outbursts are worth putting up with?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.