Other
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
{
"authors": [
"Eugene Rumer"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Eastern Europe",
"Ukraine"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Ukraine—Glimmer of Hope, but Many Unanswered Questions
The compromise between Yanukovych and the leaders of the opposition is a long-overdue step back from a disaster, but much remains unclear. Ukraine will face a set of grim prospects, the worst of which is that the country is running out of money.
By Eugene Rumer
Published on Feb 21, 2014
The compromise between Yanukovych and the leaders of the opposition is a long-overdue step back from a disaster, but much remains unclear. Clearly, stopping the violence is priority one, and it is not yet clear whether all the factions participating in the protests in the Maidan have accepted the compromise. Assuming the compromise in Kyiv holds and is accepted by all parties in the provinces, the next Ukrainian government will face a set of grim prospects, the worst of which is that Ukraine is running out of money. The damage to the economy, which had been stalling before the unrest began, may not be known for some time, but is certain to be severe. The government had less than $18 billion in reserves at the end of January, and is reportedly facing $13 billion in debt-servicing obligations in 2014. Standard & Poor’s downgrade of Ukrainian sovereign debt today included a warning that the rating agency expected Ukraine to default on its foreign currency obligations. That points to the glaring omission in the statements coming from Washington and Brussels: there is no word of a Marshall Plan for Ukraine that opposition leader Arseniy Yatsenyuk appealed for recently.
Both, Washington and Brussels have steered Ukraine to the IMF as the source of cash, but that cash will only come with serious strings attached—a series of reforms that the IMF has insisted on and previous Ukrainian governments have long resisted. These include cuts in social subsidies, cuts in residential gas subsidies, and letting go of the Hryvnya peg, almost certain to lead to a significant devaluation. What government will have the political courage to do all that before the election?
All of this points to the crucial role of the Russian $22 billion aid package—$15 billion in loans and $7 billion in gas price cuts. Where will the money come from if not from Russia? There has been a lot of talk in Washington and in Brussels about sanctions and visa bans against Ukrainian officials involved in the violence, as well as about the geopolitical tug of war with Russia. But sanctions and visa bans will neither help the new Ukrainian government get on its feet, nor prove effective in the geopolitical struggle with Russia. So far, Yatsenyuk’s plea for a Marshall Plan has fallen on deaf ears.
About the Author
Eugene Rumer
Director and Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program
Rumer, a former national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia at the U.S. National Intelligence Council, is a senior fellow and the director of Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program.
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security Strategy
- Europe Must Lead to Prevent the Worst in UkraineCommentary
Nate Reynolds, Eugene Rumer
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not LessCommentary
Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.
Dimitar Bechev
- How Can Europe Renew a Stalled Enlargement Process?Commentary
Despite offering security benefits to candidates and the EU alike, the enlargement agenda appears stalled. Why is progress not being made, and is it time for Europe to rethink its approach?
Sylvie Goulard, Gerald Knaus
- How Europe Can Survive the AI Labor TransitionCommentary
Integrating AI into the workplace will increase job insecurity, fundamentally reshaping labor markets. To anticipate and manage this transition, the EU must build public trust, provide training infrastructures, and establish social protections.
Amanda Coakley
- Can Europe Still Matter in Syria?Commentary
Europe’s interests in Syria extend beyond migration management, yet the EU trails behind other players in the country’s post-Assad reconstruction. To boost its influence in Damascus, the union must upgrade its commitment to ensuring regional stability.
Bianka Speidl, Hanga Horváth-Sántha
