• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUDemocracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Andrei Kolesnikov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine",
    "Western Europe",
    "France",
    "Germany"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary

After Minsk, Is Germany Still a Leader?

If Merkel is synonymous with Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen to the height of true European leadership.

Link Copied
By Andrei Kolesnikov
Published on Feb 19, 2015

Of course, nothing would have happened without Angela Merkel, the most influential European politician of our time. We wouldn’t have seen her and Francois Hollande in Moscow for a weekend blitz, nor would we have witnessed the magical night at the Normandy Four summit in Minsk, which conjures up associations with the Normandie-Niemen operation.

We have to understand that Vladimir Putin now resembles a seashell that is about to close: he has been cornered psychologically, and Russia’s farther distancing from the West, accompanied by the endless war, forces the Euro-Atlantic community to continue  the sanctions and support Ukraine both politically and militarily. The high-profile European leaders must not have liked the situation and decided to act.

If Merkel is synonymous with Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen to the height of true European leadership. It is telling that Germany and France—two key states with a complicated history of bilateral relations and a baggage of past wars against each other—spearheaded the efforts to save peace in Europe. In fact, the Merkel-Hollande initiative looks quite symbolic and historically relevant in the context of the countries’ track record of military confrontation, as did  the roles played by Jean Monnet, Robert Schuman, and Konrad Adenauer. Of similar importance was the French participation in constructing united Europe, which would have been impossible without Germany, and the reunification of Germany, which grew out of the collapse of the Iron Curtain and Berlin Wall.

If #Merkel is synonymous with #Germany, then German political and diplomatic weight has certainly risen.
 
Tweet This

Vladimir Putin was once considered “a German in the Kremlin.” From a psychological and linguistic standpoint, he has an easier time communicating with the West through Germany. Being a responsible and forward-thinking politician, Merkel understands that and has been trying to translate Putin’s “dialect” of Russian into the language understandable to the Europeans. And being the most influential woman in the world, she is bound to share part of her charisma with the rest of Germany.

About the Author

Andrei Kolesnikov

Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Kolesnikov was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    How the Putin Regime Subverted the Soviet Legacy

      Andrei Kolesnikov

  • Commentary
    Putin’s New Social Justice

      Andrei Kolesnikov

Andrei Kolesnikov
Former Senior Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Andrei Kolesnikov
Foreign PolicyRussiaEastern EuropeUkraineWestern EuropeFranceGermany

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Europe Must Take Charge of its Russia Diplomacy Now

    Trump is distracted and Ukraine wants Europe to step up. The continent’s leaders must find their voice and assert it in talks with Russia.

      Alissa de Carbonnel

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against Europe

    Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.

      Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?

    Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Europe from Scratch: Visions for a New European Order
    Report
    Europe from Scratch: Visions for a New European Order

    As the EU confronts profound challenges, several leaders have called for fundamental reform to the union’s model—but only modest, superficial changes have resulted. What if Europe really could be reimagined from zero today: What should such a redesigned European order look like?

      Richard Youngs, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    European Sycophancy Worked on Trump

    Nearly a year and a half after Europeans leaned into sucking up to Trump, the strategy has produced some benefits when it comes to Ukraine.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.