Suzanne Maloney, Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour
{
"authors": [
"Karim Sadjadpour"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Iranian Proliferation"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Iran",
"Israel"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Nuclear Policy",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Netanyahu Assails Iran-Nuclear Talks In Congress Address
Netanyahu’s speech to the Congress makes it harder for the administration to sell a nuclear deal in the United States.
Source: WBUR’s Here & Now
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech to Congress on the nuclear negotiations with Iran has provoked strong responses in the United States. Speaking on WBUR’s Here & Now, Carnegie’s Karim Sadjadpour said that there was tremendous support for Netanyahu’s speech in Congress, which will make it harder for President Obama and Secretary Kerry to sell a deal in the United States, if one is reached. He added that while Netanyahu spoke about the nature of the Iranian regime and its support for radicalism, he did not propose any better alternatives to the nuclear deal.
Sadjadpour added that the Iranian people would find Netanyahu’s speech “deeply disappointing.” Iran is a young country and the majority of its population was born after the revolution, making its society “post-ideological, post-revolutionary… that aspires to be part of the outside world.”
For the radical elements in Iran, he added, Netanyahu’s speech was a “godsend.” Those radicals prosper in Iran’s political and economic isolation, and have been concerned about the prospect for a nuclear deal. Netanyahu’s speech was probably “quietly applauded” by hardliners in Iran, Sadjadpour concluded.
This interview was originally broadcast by WBUR’s Here & Now.
About the Author
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Karim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.
- Iran Wanted to Survive the War. Now What?Q&A
- What’s Keeping the Iranian Regime in Power—for NowQ&A
Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour, Robin Wright
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Europe
- Letter from the Editor: Europe Takes Two Steps Forward But One Step BackCommentary
As we close out another season of Strategic Europe, it is worth taking stock of the deep shifts underway.
Rym Momtaz
- Taking the Pulse: Are the EU’s Watered-Down Russia Sanctions Better than None?Commentary
The EU had to compromise to adopt a twenty-first sanctions package against Russia, exposing growing cracks in the union’s resolve. Is this latest, weaker round worth it to keep pressure on Moscow?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Why Europe Must Take Charge of its Russia Diplomacy NowCommentary
Trump is distracted and Ukraine wants Europe to step up. The continent’s leaders must find their voice and assert it in talks with Russia.
Alissa de Carbonnel
- Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against EuropeCommentary
Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.
Maksym Beznosiuk
- Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?Commentary
Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?
Rym Momtaz, ed.